Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
Published on: September 11, 2021
Chest Wall Reconstruction Using Biologic Mesh to Cover Soft Tissue Defects: A Narrative Review
Jeffrey B Velotta1, Jason Hammer2, Vivek Mukhatyar2
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; Department of Clinical Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California.
Biologic mesh offers a promising alternative for chest wall reconstruction (CWR), showing fewer complications than synthetic options. Further research is needed to fully understand the risks and benefits of different biologic mesh types for CWR.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Chest wall reconstruction (CWR) addresses functional and aesthetic deficits of the thoracic wall post-resection.
- Biologic mesh is increasingly utilized for soft tissue coverage in CWR procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current literature on using biologic mesh for CWR.
- To report on the application of a specific porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix in CWR.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies involving biologic mesh in CWR.
- Expert opinion was gathered regarding the use of porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flaps for large chest wall defects.
Main Results:
- Biologic mesh is employed in CWR for oncologic resections, trauma, congenital defects, and complex cases (large defects, infection, prior radiation).
- Retrospective studies suggest biologic mesh in CWR is associated with fewer complications, infections, and explantations compared to synthetic mesh.
- Limited data and absence of randomized controlled trials comparing mesh types exist; however, a case study showed successful CWR with porcine acellular dermal matrix and muscle flap reconstruction over 6 years.
Conclusions:
- Literature and expert opinion support the use of biologic mesh in CWR.
- More extensive clinical data are required to guide surgeons in selecting the optimal mesh type based on risks and benefits.
More Related Videos
20:33A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019
05:15Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022