Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and evaluation of back-end compressors for compressed content for cochlear implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Decoding selective attention in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Speech and music source separation for cochlear implant users: front-end and end-to-end approach.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Phase coherence of cochlear microphonic potentials in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Selective auditory attention decoding in bilateral cochlear implant users to music instruments.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Correction: The auditory nerve implant-concept and device description of a novel electrical auditory prosthesis.

Bioelectronic medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.8K

Cortical temporal mismatch compensation in bimodal cochlear implant users: Selective attention decoding and

Hanna Dolhopiatenko1, Waldo Nogueira1

  • 1Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4all', Hannover, Germany.

Hearing Research
|May 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users experience variable speech perception due to temporal mismatch. Compensating for this mismatch improved neural responses, but not behavioral speech understanding, suggesting neural metrics are more sensitive to timing differences.

Keywords:
Behavioral speech understandingBimodal stimulationCochlear implantElectric acoustic integrationObjective measuresPupillometrySelective attention decodingTemporal mismatchalpha power

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

475
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.8K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

475
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Bimodal cochlear implant (CI) use combines electrical and acoustic stimulation, often improving speech perception but subject to variability.
  • Temporal mismatch between electric and acoustic signals can interfere with auditory signal integration.
  • Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) can estimate temporal mismatch by analyzing N1 latencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate individual temporal mismatch in bimodal CI users using CAEPs.
  • To investigate the impact of temporal mismatch compensation on speech perception.
  • To compare behavioral and objective neural measures of speech processing under different temporal conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Bimodal CI users underwent speech perception tests under three conditions: clinical, compensated temporal mismatch, and 50 ms temporal mismatch.
  • Objective measures included pupillometry and electroencephalography (EEG) for CAEPs and selective attention decoding (parietal alpha power).
  • N1 latency of CAEPs was used to estimate temporal mismatch.

Main Results:

  • Behavioral speech understanding and pupillometry showed no significant differences across listening conditions.
  • CAEPs N1P2 amplitude was highest with compensated temporal mismatch.
  • Neural metrics like CAEPs phase-locking value and selective attention decoding improved with temporal compensation compared to a 50 ms mismatch, but not compared to the clinical setting.

Conclusions:

  • Neural metrics are more sensitive than behavioral measures in detecting interaural temporal mismatch effects in bimodal CI users.
  • Temporal mismatch compensation showed neural benefits, particularly in CAEPs N1P2 amplitude, but limited behavioral impact.
  • Solely compensating for temporal mismatch may be insufficient for optimal bimodal CI benefit.