Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Whole-body PET/MRI of Pediatric Patients: The Details That Matter
Published on: December 19, 2017
Overview of Adverse Reactions of Radiopharmaceuticals
M R Mititelu1, V Stanulovic2, A Mitoi1
1University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Central University Emergency Military Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Aims:
Theranostics utilizes the nuclear properties of radioactive isotopes, especially for molecular imaging and targeted therapy. Radiopharmaceuticals (RPs), which combine a pharmaceutical ligand with a radionuclide, enable accurate diagnosis and treatment of various diseases through modalities such as PET and SPECT imaging. The aim of this papare is to review adverse reactions associated with diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, with an emphasis on their severity and clinical management.
Materials And Methods:
This review evaluates documented adverse effects (AEs) related to RPs used in nuclear medicine imaging (PET and SPECT) and radionuclide therapy, focusing on their severity and clinical management strategies. It also considers the mechanisms of RPs toxicity, distinguishes between general and specific AEs, and highlights the limitations in current adverse drug reaction (ADR) assessment tools. The methodology used was the research and synthesis of most relevant published literature data; most relevant papers were synthesized regarding the reporting system of ARs and categorized by the specific and systemic adverse effects of RPs.
Results:
Side effects from diagnostic RPs are relatively rare and typically minimal. Therapeutic RPs, selected for their high-energy radiation properties, can cause DNA damage to malignant cells while minimizing harm to healthy tissues. Although adverse effects do occur, they are generally fewer and less severe compared to conventional therapies. Severe toxicity is rare and often preventable. Both patient- and provider-reported ADRs offer important safety insights, though validated assessment instruments remain limited.
Conclusion:
Radionuclide therapy offers a targeted approach that is a less invasive alternative to conventional treatments with a favorable safety profile. Continued evaluation of adverse reactions and the development of standardized ADR assessment tools are essential for improving patient outcomes and RP safety monitoring.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
09:55Radiosynthesis, Quality Control, and Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of 68Ga-Labelled Nano Molecules
Published on: October 4, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...