Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Intimate partner violence and time to making an abortion appointment in the United States
Sameera S Nayak1, Arielle A J Scoglio2, Taiwo Sanni-Ojikutu3
1Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Public Health, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA; Center for Health, Equity, and Aging, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Objective:
Intimate partner violence (IPV), the experience of physical and sexual violence, stalking, and/or psychological aggression within an existing or prior intimate relationship, may influence reproductive autonomy and abortion access. This study examined the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization and time to scheduling abortion services for pregnant people in the United States (U.S).
Study Design:
Data come from the Guttmacher Institute's Abortion Patient Survey (APS), a nationally representative non-hospital sample of U.S. women seeking abortions in 2014 (n = 7013). We estimated survey-weighted logistic regression to model the association between IPV victimization (physical and sexual) and two-week delays in abortion scheduling, controlling for a variety of sociodemographic variables.
Results:
The prevalence of any IPV was 5.02 %, and 17.30 % of participants had abortion scheduling delays of at least two weeks. In bivariate models, experiencing IPV was associated with 1.62 times the odds of abortion scheduling delays compared to those who were not experiencing IPV (95 % CI 1.26, 2.09). In multivariable models controlling for sociodemographic covariates victimization was associated with 1.41 times the odds of abortion scheduling delays compared to non-victimization (95 % CI 1.06, 1.86).
Conclusions:
IPV was associated with a 2-week delay in scheduling an abortion procedure following making the decision to obtain an abortion. In the increasingly restrictive policy climate, IPV-related delays in scheduling services may make abortions functionally inaccessible. Universal IPV screening and education provisions in healthcare settings (including primary care, gynecology and obstetrics) and community-based settings and for individuals seeking abortions are necessary to ensure timely access to safe and legal abortions.
More Related Videos
10:45Double In Utero Electroporation to Target Temporally and Spatially Separated Cell Populations
Published on: June 14, 2020
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Bystander Effect
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...