Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
ROBotic-assisted Early Mobilization in ventilated surgical critically ill patients (ROBEM-I)-A randomized,
Marco Lorenz1, Nadine Langer1, Philipp Kloss1
1Charité́ - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CVK, CCM), Berlin, Germany.
Background:
A shortage of human resources is a key barrier to the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Recent advancements in robotic mobilization systems offer promising solutions to this challenge.
Objective(S):
This study assessed the operability of an AI-assisted robotic mobilization system by a single healthcare provider, along with its safety, feasibility, and potential benefits for mechanically ventilated surgical ICU patients.
Design:
Randomized controlled pilot study.
Setting:
Five surgical ICUs at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany, November 2020 to September 2022.
Patients:
Twenty critically ill patients requiring >24 h of mechanical ventilation.
Intervention(S):
Twice-daily robotic-assisted mobilization sessions ≥ 20 min over five days, compared to the control group receiving standard care.
Main Outcome Measures:
Number of mobilization sessions conducted by a single person.
Results:
In the robotic-assisted group, no mobility sessions were conducted by a single person (0%) vs. 26 (96%) in the control group (p < 0.001). Significant secondary outcomes included a mobilization duration of 41 min/day [IQR 36-47] in the intervention group vs. 19 min/day [IQR 13-21] in the control group (p < 0.001) and higher mobilization frequency, with two units/day [IQR 2-2] in the intervention group vs. 0.9 units/day [IQR 0.7-1.0] in the control group (p < 0.001). Interleukin-6 levels decreased significantly by -4.65 pg/mL [IQR -13.00-3.83] in the intervention group vs. an increase of 3.70 pg/ml [IQR -1.30-28.88] in the control group (p = 0.049).
Conclusions:
Robotic-assisted mobilization in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients did not reduce required healthcare providers but increased the duration and frequency, and significantly reduced IL-6 levels compared to the standard group.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number NCT04423796.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...

