Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Development of quality indicators for a community pharmacy setting
Ann Helen Jakobsen1, Noriko Sato2, Timothy F Chen2
1Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoepidemiology (IPSUM research group), Department of Pharmacy, The Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsoe, Norway.
Developing healthcare quality indicators (QIs) for Norwegian community pharmacies is crucial. This study used the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) and disagreement index (DI) to reach consensus on QIs, finding that disagreement handling significantly impacts acceptable measures.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement in Healthcare
- Pharmacy Practice and Management
Background:
- Community pharmacies in Norway provide accessible healthcare services requiring standardized quality monitoring.
- Establishing relevant and realistic quality indicators (QIs) is essential for setting community pharmacy standards.
- Previous methods for QI development may not adequately address consensus-building in diverse settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish consensus on healthcare quality measures (QIs) for community pharmacy services in Norway.
- To implement and evaluate two distinct approaches for developing and selecting QIs.
- To assess the impact of disagreement handling on the final selection of QIs.
Main Methods:
- A multi-phase research design was employed, including workshops, focus groups, and literature reviews to identify potential QIs.
- A modified Delphi study involving thirteen panellists over two rounds was conducted.
- The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) with panel median ratings and disagreement index (DI) was used to assess QI appropriateness and achieve consensus.
Main Results:
- Initially, 192 potential QIs were identified, reduced to 137 after merging and removing duplicates.
- In Round 1, 61 QIs were deemed appropriate. In Round 2, 23 QIs achieved consensus without disagreement.
- The total number of QIs considered appropriate without disagreement after both rounds was 34 (using RAM) and 10 (incorporating DI).
Conclusions:
- The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) combined with the disagreement index (DI) effectively establishes consensus on QIs for community pharmacy services.
- The method chosen for handling disagreement in panel ratings significantly influences the number of QIs considered acceptable.
- Incorporating DI and conventional RAM disagreement calculations reduced the number of acceptable QIs by half, highlighting the importance of rigorous consensus methods.
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Quality Assurance
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.

