Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025
Robotic Enucleation of an Intra-Pancreatic Insulinoma in the Pancreatic Head
Published on: January 3, 2020
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic core-needle/microforceps biopsy is a valuable diagnostic tool for pancreatic
Saba Shafi1, Wendy L Frankel1, Zaibo Li1
1Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Objective:
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided, fine-needle core biopsy (FNB), and through-the-needle microforceps biopsy (TTNB) are latest tools for evaluating pancreatic lesions. We aim to provide subspecialty surgical pathologists' experience with EUS-FNB/TTNB in diagnosing pancreatic lesions at a large academic center.
Methods:
A 3-year review identified 101 EUS pancreatic specimens submitted for surgical pathology: 87 biopsy specimens (FNB = 58, TTNB = 29) and 14 fine-needle aspirations (FNAs). Diagnoses were compared with cytology and resection specimens when available.
Results:
Of the 101 cases, 10 had previous EUS-FNA cytology with inconclusive diagnoses. Rebiopsy with EUS-FNB/TTNB provided definitive diagnoses in 9 cases. Thirty-five cases (18 cystic and 17 solid lesions) had concurrent surgical pathology and cytology specimens. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB/TTNB biopsy specimens (69%) was significantly higher than that of cytology specimens (26%, P = .0017), as was the diagnostic accuracy (P = .0012). This diagnostic advantage was statistically significant in cystic lesions (FNB/TTNB [83.3%] vs cytology [16.7%] for achieving a specific diagnosis, P = .0002) but not in solid lesions (61.5% vs 46.2%, P = .6951). Only in 1 case did cytology (adenocarcinoma) provide a more definitive diagnosis than surgical pathology (high-grade dysplasia cannot exclude adenocarcinoma).
Conclusions:
The EUS-FNB/TTNB methods complement EUS-FNA cytology in diagnosing pancreatic lesions, and they often outperforms concurrent cytology specimens, particularly in cystic lesions.
