Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval-Censored Cause-Specific Joint Model.
Zhenwei Yang1,2, Dimitris Rizopoulos1,2, Eveline A M Heijnsdijk3
1Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands.
Personalized biopsy schedules for active surveillance (AS) reduce prostate cancer biopsies by up to 52%. This approach uses an interval-censored cause-specific joint model (ICJM) to tailor testing frequency based on individual risk, minimizing overtreatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biostatistics
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer reduces overtreatment but relies on fixed biopsy schedules.
- Current fixed biopsy schedules are not personalized and can lead to patient burden from frequent invasive procedures.
- The optimal frequency for monitoring cancer progression in AS remains undetermined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a personalized biopsy scheduling strategy for prostate cancer active surveillance.
- To model the impact of longitudinal biomarkers on cancer progression while accounting for competing risks.
- To optimize biopsy timing by balancing the number of procedures and detection delay.
Main Methods:
- Proposed an interval-censored cause-specific joint model (ICJM) to integrate longitudinal biomarkers and cancer progression.
- Incorporated interval-censoring, competing risks of early treatment, and uncertainty in progression detection.
- Developed patient-specific risk profiles to trigger biopsies when a predefined risk threshold is exceeded.
Main Results:
- The ICJM successfully models cancer progression with competing risks and interval-censoring.
- Personalized biopsy schedules significantly reduced the number of biopsies per patient by 41%-52% compared to fixed schedules.
- This reduction in biopsies came with a slight increase in the delay of cancer progression detection.
Conclusions:
- Personalized biopsy schedules based on patient-specific risk profiles are feasible and effective for prostate cancer AS.
- The proposed ICJM offers a robust statistical framework for optimizing AS monitoring.
- This approach has the potential to reduce patient burden and healthcare costs associated with prostate cancer management.
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Cancer Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Censoring Survival Data
Assumptions of Survival Analysis

