Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Insertion, Maintenance, and Removal of the Percutaneous Dual Lumen Cannula Right Ventricular Assist Device
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left ventricular decompression in paediatric veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: Reviewing the evidence
Giacomo Veronese1,2, Paolo Meani2,3, Domenico Sirico4
1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Insights
Left ventricular decompression during pediatric veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECLS) is complex and inconsistently applied. Strategies vary by patient age and clinical context, with benefits most evident in post-cardiotomy cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECLS) is vital for neonates and children with circulatory collapse.
- VA ECLS can lead to left ventricular (LV) overload, hindering myocardial recovery and causing complications.
- Optimal LV decompression strategies in pediatric VA ECLS are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review LV decompression strategies in pediatric patients (<18 years) on VA ECLS.
- To analyze the prevalence, techniques, safety, and outcomes of different LV decompression methods.
- To identify factors influencing strategy selection and highlight areas for future research.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines (1993-2024).
- Inclusion of 11 retrospective cohort and registry-based studies (2012-2024) involving 1222 pediatric patients.
- Review of 13 case series and 28 case reports on VA ECLS and LV decompression.
Main Results:
- LV decompression prevalence varied (10.5% to 46.6%) based on clinical setting (e.g., post-cardiotomy).
- Percutaneous decompression (57.4%) and balloon atrial septostomy (50%) were common, especially in younger patients on peripheral VA ECLS.
- Surgical approaches predominated in central VA ECLS, particularly post-cardiotomy; complication rates varied significantly by technique.
Conclusions:
- LV decompression during pediatric VA ECLS is challenging, with diverse and inconsistently adopted strategies.
- Benefits are more apparent in the post-cardiotomy setting, showing improved survival and reduced adverse events.
- Further prospective studies and collaborative registries are crucial for standardizing strategies and optimizing risk-benefit profiles.
Abstract:
Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECLS) is crucial for neonatal and paediatric patients with severe circulatory collapse but may cause left ventricular (LV) overload, affecting myocardial recovery and causing complications. Evidence on optimal LV decompression strategies in paediatric patients remains limited. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, including articles published between 1993 and 2024 focused on VA ECLS and LV decompression in patients under 18 years of age. The review included 11 retrospective cohorts and registry-based studies (2012-2024), totalling 1222 paediatric patients undergoing decompression. Patient demographics, initial diagnoses and VA ECLS settings were heterogeneous. The prevalence of LV decompression ranged from 46.6% in post-cardiotomy to 10.5% in non-post-cardiotomy peripheral VA ECLS cases. Most patients (57.1%) were supported with peripheral VA ECLS, and the majority (57.4%) underwent percutaneous decompression, whereas surgical approaches predominated in post-cardiotomy central VA ECLS. Balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) was the most frequent technique (50%), followed by surgically placed left atrial cannula (37.4%). Thirteen case series (70 patients) and 28 case reports (28 patients) were also reviewed. Substantial variability in LV decompression strategies exists based on age and clinical scenario. PAS-based techniques were more common in younger patients on peripheral VA ECLS while older children often underwent different strategies. Surgical approaches were preferred in central VA ECLS, particularly in the post-cardiotomy setting. Procedural safety varied by technique. While PAS-based strategies such as BAS generally showed low complication rates, adverse events like arrhythmia, bleeding and cardiac perforation were reported in 7%-9% of cases. Surgical LA cannulation was associated with higher bleeding risk. Impella use was linked to haemolysis (50%) and major bleeding (20%). Comparative data highlight that each technique carries distinct procedural risks and complication profiles. In conclusion, LV decompression during paediatric VA ECLS remains technically challenging and variably adopted. Its benefit appears more consistent in the post-cardiotomy setting, where improved survival and reduced adverse outcomes were observed. Given the lack of standardization, further prospective studies and collaborative registries are essential to guide strategy selection, timing and risk-benefit balance, particularly in such a vulnerable population.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

