Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
Published on: April 25, 2025
Understanding barriers to stool adequacy: results from a programmatic assessment of Pakistan's acute flaccid
Keri Geiger1, Abul Aziz2, Chukwuma Mbaeyi1
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Introduction:
Pakistan's acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance system is an essential part of efforts to eradicate poliomyelitis, as Pakistan and Afghanistan are the only countries where wild poliovirus remains endemic. The two primary performance indicators for AFP surveillance are the non-polio AFP rate for children aged <15 years and stool adequacy, defined as the percentage of AFP cases for which two timely stool samples arrive at the laboratory in good condition. Despite consistently meeting targets for both indicators at the national level, some districts in Pakistan failed to meet the stool adequacy target of ≥80% in 2023 or had declining stool adequacy. In March 2024, we assessed AFP surveillance in 12 districts in Pakistan with low stool adequacy to characterize barriers to meeting the target.
Methods:
The assessment included review of case investigation forms from AFP cases with patient paralysis onset during January 2023-mid-March 2024 with inadequate stool samples, as well as visits to health facilities serving as active surveillance sites and interviews with surveillance and laboratory personnel.
Results:
The most common barrier to stool adequacy was a delay between onset of paralysis and AFP case notification, which occurred in 111 of 158 (70%) inadequately sampled AFP cases reviewed. This delay was most frequently attributed to missed reporting by healthcare facilities, caretakers seeking healthcare many days after paralysis onset, or a combination of both. Additionally, only 63% of health facilities showed adequate active surveillance visit compliance.
Discussion:
The assessment exposed gaps in AFP surveillance knowledge for some health facility staff, especially nurses and other paramedical or support professionals. Recommendations to improve the AFP surveillance system include monitoring and encouraging compliance with systematically scheduled health facility visits, increasing the frequency of AFP surveillance orientations, including paramedical professionals in AFP surveillance training, and developing a comprehensive messaging plan to increase knowledge about prompt reporting of AFP among healthcare providers and the public.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:

