Related Experiment Videos
Cognitive science and behaviourism.
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|August 1, 1985
Summary
Cognitive scientists incorrectly revive the autonomous mind theory using brain science and computer simulations. This paper critiques their misuse of metaphors, flawed methodologies, and misinterpretation of scientific data in understanding behavior.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Neuroscience
- Philosophy of Mind
Background:
- Cognitive science often relies on brain science and computer simulations.
- A traditional view posits an internal, autonomous mind initiating behavior.
- This perspective has been revived by some contemporary cognitive scientists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the methodologies and assumptions used by cognitive scientists.
- To challenge the revival of the internal, autonomous mind theory in cognitive science.
- To highlight the misapplication of scientific concepts and terms in cognitive research.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of arguments and methodologies in cognitive science literature.
- Critique of the use of metaphors like 'storage and retrieval'.
- Examination of the interpretation of neurological data and experimental conditions.
Main Results:
- Cognitive scientists have misused the storage and retrieval metaphor.
- Neurology has been assigned a misleading role.
- Controlled experimental conditions are often replaced by descriptions.
- Behavioral assessment is substituted with statements of expectations and intentions.
- Feelings and states of mind are incorrectly treated as causes of behavior.
- Key scientific terms remain inadequately defined.
Conclusions:
- The revival of the autonomous mind theory by cognitive scientists is based on flawed reasoning and methodology.
- Misinterpretations of brain science and computational models undermine their claims.
- A more rigorous and scientifically precise approach is needed in cognitive science research.