Related Experiment Videos
Immediate resection in emergency large bowel surgery: a 7 year audit
The British Journal of Surgery
|September 1, 1985
Summary
Emergency large bowel disease admissions often require urgent surgery. Primary resection and immediate anastomosis are safe and effective, with low morbidity and economical treatment for selected patients.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Surgery
Background:
- Large bowel emergencies represent a significant cause of emergency hospital admissions.
- Colonic obstruction and peritonitis are the most frequent indications for surgical intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of urgent surgical management for large bowel emergencies.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of primary resection and immediate anastomosis in these patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 153 consecutive emergency admissions for large bowel disease over a 7-year period.
- Evaluation of surgical interventions, including primary resection and immediate anastomosis.
- Analysis of postoperative outcomes such as mortality, sepsis rates, and hospital stay.
Main Results:
- 68% of patients underwent urgent operations, with 79% having primary resection.
- Primary resection had a 12.2% mortality rate and low intraperitoneal (2.4%) and wound (7.3%) sepsis rates.
- Immediate anastomosis in 56% of operated patients showed an 8.7% mortality rate and 2.2% anastomotic leak rate.
- Mortality is linked to patient age and advanced malignancy.
Conclusions:
- Urgent surgical intervention, including primary resection, is feasible in over 80% of patients with large bowel emergencies.
- Immediate anastomosis following proximal colonic resection is safe.
- Intra-operative colonic irrigation facilitates primary anastomosis in selected distal colon resections, offering potentially lower morbidity and cost-effective treatment.