Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025
Use of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation to Assess the Origin of Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Published on: October 3, 2018
Comparison of outcomes between haploidentical and matched related donors for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: A
Yu-Qian Sun1, Li-Xin Wu1,2, Yi-Cheng Zhang3
1National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative strategy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, few reports have investigated the outcomes of patients receiving haploidentical HSCT. To this end, we included 117 patients with haploidentical donors (HID) and 75 patients with matched related donors (MRD) from 28 centers across China to explore the prognostic impact of different transplantation modalities. We found no significant difference between these two groups in terms of event-free survival (EFS, p = .211), overall survival (OS, p = .503), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, p = .076) or non-relapse mortality (NRM, p = .794). The predominance of peripheral blood (PB) graft source over bone marrow and PB since 2020 may have contributed to the worse outcomes in the MRD group. Moreover, CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) lower-risk patients benefited more from the HID modality with superior EFS (p = .006). Multivariate analysis indicated that advanced age (p = .013), anemia at diagnosis (p = .010), and donor relationship (parent-to-child, p = .013) were independently associated with worse EFS in the HID group. Our data suggested that HID was comparable to MRD in CMML. However, under certain conditions, such as CPSS lower-risk ones, HID was preferred.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative strategy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, few reports have investigated the outcomes of patients receiving haploidentical HSCT. To this end, we included 117 patients with haploidentical donors (HID) and 75 patients with matched related donors (MRD) from 28 centers across China to explore the prognostic impact of different transplantation modalities. We found no significant difference between these two groups in terms of event-free survival (EFS, p = .211), overall survival (OS, p = .503), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, p = .076) or non-relapse mortality (NRM, p = .794). The predominance of peripheral blood (PB) graft source over bone marrow and PB since 2020 may have contributed to the worse outcomes in the MRD group. Moreover, CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) lower-risk patients benefited more from the HID modality with superior EFS (p = .006). Multivariate analysis indicated that advanced age (p = .013), anemia at diagnosis (p = .010), and donor relationship (parent-to-child, p = .013) were independently associated with worse EFS in the HID group. Our data suggested that HID was comparable to MRD in CMML. However, under certain conditions, such as CPSS lower-risk ones, HID was preferred.
More Related Videos
11:59Detection of Residual Donor Erythroid Progenitor Cells after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Hemoglobinopathies
Published on: September 6, 2017
05:32In Vivo Osteo-organoid Approach for Harvesting Therapeutic Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
Published on: February 16, 2024
