Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
From the p-Factor to Cognitive Content: Detection and Discrimination of Psychopathologies Based on Explainable
1Department of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Social Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Abstract:
Background and Aims: Differentiating psychopathologies is challenging due to shared underlying mechanisms, such as the p-factor. Nevertheless, recent methodological advances suggest that distinct linguistic markers can help detect and differentiate these conditions. This study aimed to use cognitive content analysis with advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to (Study 1) distinguish among control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups and (Study 2) detect general psychopathology. Methods: Data from 1901 participants (retained from 2551 respondents aged 18-43 years who completed the Beier sentence completion test [BSCT]) were analyzed. For Study 1, groups were formed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21); negative mood was assessed via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). For Study 2, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) categorized general psychopathology and self-reported diagnostic status served as external validation. Two analytic approaches were employed: (1) textual analysis with a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model and (2) subscale-score analysis using a support vector machine (SVM). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpreted the ML models. Results: In Study 1, the models distinguished control, depression, anxiety, and depressive-anxiety groups. Anxiety was marked by positive content, hope, and I-Talk, whereas depression involved negative, hopeless content. Depressive-anxiety combined features of anxiety with a pronounced negative outlook, suggesting a transitional phase where diminishing hope may bridge anxiety to depression. In Study 2, the models performed high in distinguishing the self-reported pathology diagnosis group (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.81 [BERT], 0.85 [SVM]) from subclinical samples but failed to differentiate the self-reported past diagnosis (AUC: 0.53 [BERT], 0.57 [SVM]) group from controls. This implies that cognitive changes in psychopathology may share a consistent underlying structure like p-factor. Conclusion: These pioneer findings demonstrate that integrating advanced computational techniques can identify key linguistic markers and guide the development of language-based diagnostic tools, potentially transforming mental health diagnostics.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
09:38Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the...
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Attribution