Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

458
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
458
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

281
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
281
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

303
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
303
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

200
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
200
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

639
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
639
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

140
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
140

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preventing childhood accidental poisoning and chemical burn injury at home through an interactive programme based on GHS hazard warning signs: single-group pretest and post-test intervention study in Jordan.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2025
Same author

Critical deficits in CBRNE preparedness: A nationwide assessment of Jordanian healthcare providers' knowledge, skills, and training gaps.

SAGE open medicine·2025
Same author

Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Implementation of the Sepsis Six Protocol by Nurses in Acute Care Settings in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

SAGE open nursing·2025
Same author

Fatigue and health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Journal of research in nursing : JRN·2025
Same author

Enhancing Quality of Life: The Effect of Complete Decongestive Therapy on Jordanian Women With Breast Cancer After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

European journal of breast health·2025
Same author

Self-Efficacy of Nurses and Physicians in the Emergency Department and Its Influence on the Outcomes of Trauma Patients.

Hospital topics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Bayesian Model Prediction for Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Analysis.

Islam Bani Mohammad1, Muayyad M Ahmad2

  • 1Department of Nursing, Al-Balqa Applied University, Faculty of Nursing, Al-Salt, Jordan.

European Journal of Breast Health
|May 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models, specifically Bayesian networks, accurately predict breast cancer survival. Key factors include white blood cell count, hemoglobin, hypertension, and diabetes, aiding clinical decisions.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelbreast cancermachine learningprediction modelssurvival

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

381
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

381
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Biostatistics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly utilized for breast cancer survival prediction.
  • Accurate prediction remains a significant challenge for cancer researchers.
  • Advancements in ML algorithms have improved predictive capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To predict breast cancer survival rates using a Bayesian network model.
  • To evaluate the performance of ML models in breast cancer prognosis.
  • To identify key predictors of breast cancer patient survival.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 2,995 breast cancer patients hospitalized between 2012 and 2024.
  • Data split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets for model development.
  • Bayesian network model incorporated demographic and clinical variables (e.g., hemoglobin, WBC, hypertension, diabetes).

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian network model achieved the highest accuracy (96.661%) and AUC (0.859).
  • White blood cell count at diagnosis was the most significant predictor of survival.
  • Abnormal hemoglobin, elevated white blood cell counts, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with reduced survival probability.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian models demonstrate superior performance in predicting breast cancer survival.
  • Demographic and routine laboratory data are valuable inputs for ML-based survival prediction.
  • Accurate survival prediction is crucial for effective clinical decision-making in breast cancer care.