Qualitative assessment of hepatic steatosis on modern grayscale ultrasound: more accurate than previously thought?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Analysis of Fluorescent-Stained Lipid Droplets with 3D Reconstruction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment
Published on: June 2, 2023
Luyao Shen1, Richa Patel2, Lindsey Negrete2
1Stanford University, Stanford, USA. lyshen@stanford.edu.
Objective:
To assess the diagnostic performance of standardized qualitative assessment of hepatic steatosis on grayscale ultrasound.
Methods:
This retrospective, single-center, multi-case, multi-reader study included 200 patients with ultrasound examinations of the liver. Three readers assessed hepatic steatosis based on a standardized system of 3 ultrasound features: presence of increased fine echoes, visualization of right hemidiaphragm, and visualization of portal triads, assigning a four-grade category (normal, mild, moderate, or severe). Magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was used as reference standard. Binary discrimination (normal vs. steatosis) was summarized with binary area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Discrimination across four categories was performed with pairwise comparisons. Reader differences were tested with the Obuchowski-Rockette-Hillis model. Inter-reader agreement was calculated with Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC).
Results:
Of the 200 patients, 27% (54/200) had normal liver (MRI-PDFF < 5%), 35% (70/200) had mild steatosis (MRI-PDFF ≥ 5-17.4%), 15% (29/200) had moderate steatosis (MRI-PDFF > 17.4-22.1%), and 24% (47/200) had severe steatosis (MRI-PDFF > 22.1%). Median time interval between ultrasound and MRI exams was 4 days (IQR 1-28). Sensitivity, specific, and binary AUC for readers 1/2/3 were 90%/82%/94%, 65%/82%/54%, and 0.87/0.85/0.88 with no statistically significant difference between readers (p = 0.46). Four-class category analysis showed excellent performance of ultrasound to distinguish extreme categories (AUC > 0.95 for normal vs. severe). Inter-reader agreement was substantial (Gwet's AC 0.63) for steatosis category assignment and moderate to substantial (Gwet's AC 0.55-0.71) for ultrasound features.
Conclusion:
Contrary to popular belief, qualitative ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis is accurate in detecting and grading steatosis when evaluation criteria are standardized.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...

