Evaluation of tolerance towards ureteral double-J-stents in children: an unmet need

Dafni Planta1, Raphael N Vuille-Dit-Bille1, Stefan Holland-Cunz1

  • 1Division of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.

PubMed

Insights

Pediatric ureteric double-J stents (DJS) cause irritative symptoms in many children, with pain increasing with age. A new questionnaire helps assess DJS tolerance and quality of life in pediatric patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Medical Devices
  • Patient Quality of Life

Background:

  • Ureteric double-J stents (DJS) are frequently used in pediatric urology.
  • Adults often experience severe irritative symptoms and decreased quality of life with DJS.
  • Little is known about DJS tolerance in children, and standardized assessment methods are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess pediatric tolerance of DJS in relation to age.
  • To evaluate irritative symptom rates in children with DJS.
  • To highlight the need for standardized DJS evaluation in pediatric care.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, observational, single-center study over 14 months.
  • Developed and administered a questionnaire to children post-DJS removal, assessing 5 categories.
  • Enrolled 20 pediatric patients (mean age 5.8 years) with indwelling DJS.

Main Results:

  • 13 out of 20 patients reported irritative symptoms (pain, voiding problems) during the mean 6-week indwelling period.
  • A positive association was found between patient age and reported pain scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.54, p = 0.04).
  • Pediatric patients experienced less severe complications and a less impaired quality of life compared to adults, but symptom occurrence was high.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a foundation for standardized re-evaluation of ureteral stents in pediatric patients.
  • A specialized questionnaire offers a quantitative tool for assessing pediatric quality of life with indwelling ureteral stents.
  • Future validation of the questionnaire through a large-scale, multi-center study is recommended.