Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Cost Utility of Intensive Home Treatment Compared With Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Admission
Tamara Waldmann1, Andreas Bechdolf2,3,4, Konstantinos Nikolaidis2,3
1Section of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University at Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Günzburg, Germany.
Intensive home treatment (IHT) is a cost-effective alternative for severe mental illness crises compared to inpatient care. Further research is needed due to stochastic uncertainty in economic efficiency findings.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Psychiatric Care
- Mental Health Services Research
Background:
- Intensive home treatment (IHT) is recognized as a safe and effective alternative to psychiatric inpatient care during acute crises.
- Severe mental illness (SMI) management requires efficient and effective treatment strategies, particularly during acute episodes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Intensive Home Treatment (IHT) versus traditional inpatient treatment for individuals with severe mental illness experiencing acute crises within the German healthcare system.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental, non-randomized trial involving 400 patients (200 IHT, 200 inpatient) across 10 German sites from January 2021 to December 2022.
- Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups, with a 12-month observation period.
- Cost-utility analysis was conducted from societal and statutory health insurance perspectives, calculating Incremental Cost Utility Ratios (ICURs) and using bootstrapping for uncertainty analysis.
Main Results:
- The study found point estimates for ICURs of €48,786.43 (statutory health insurance perspective) and €38,433.81 (societal perspective).
- Acceptability rates for IHT as a cost-effective option were 67% (societal) and 60% (statutory health insurance) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000.
- Acceptability decreased at a €50,000 threshold, with rates of 50% (societal) and 44% (statutory health insurance).
Conclusions:
- Intensive Home Treatment (IHT) demonstrates potential cost-effectiveness compared to inpatient care for acute psychiatric crises in individuals with severe mental illness.
- While results suggest IHT is a viable economic alternative, significant stochastic uncertainty necessitates further research for clearer economic efficiency assessment.
- The findings indicate a slightly higher probability of cost-effectiveness for statutory health insurance compared to the overall economy.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Restorative Care
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications

