Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

In Ovo Feeding of Commercial Broiler Eggs: An Accurate and Reproducible Method to Affect Muscle Development and Growth
Published on: September 20, 2021
Loading-related injuries of mechanically loaded broilers under field conditions
Julia Unterholzner1, Elke Rauch1, Alexandra Blaeske1
1Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinaerstr. 13/R, D-80539 Munich, Germany.
Abstract:
This publication is part of a large study whose objective was to assess animal welfare during 32 mechanical loadings of broilers. We here focus on animal health aspects and the influences of circumstances during mechanical loading. Broilers in two husbandry systems (HS) (mean number of fattening days: HS 2: 41.3 days; HS 3: 40.1 days) were assessed on-farm for loading-related injuries such as fractures, hematomas, and abrasions before and after mechanical loading. The influence of conveyor belt speed (fast vs. slow), container type (GP container vs. SmartStack container), HS, fattening method (FM), season, and sex on loading-related injuries was analyzed. The two HS were grouped according to the specifications of a retail trade label into three FM (HS 2: Standard and Standard Premium, HS 3: Premium), which differed, among other aspects, in genotype, stocking density, dark period, and access to a veranda. Hematomas on the wing (6.55%) were the most common type of injury followed by hematomas on the wing tip (6.17%), abrasions on the body (4.92%), abrasions on the wing tip (4.25%), severe wing injuries (1.13%), and hematomas on the wing proximal to the wing tip (0.38%). A reduction in injuries was achieved by a slow belt speed, the use of a SmartStack container, and loadings during spring and summer. Loading broilers of HS 3 compared with those of HS 2 led to a significantly lower risk of severe wing injuries, total abrasions, and wing tip abrasions. Broilers of the Standard Premium (P = 0.038) and Premium FM (P = <0.001) had a significantly lower risk of severe wing injuries than those of the Standard FM, demonstrating that not only the genotype, which is one of the major differences between HS 2 and 3, influences the injury rate. Other differences in FM, such as a longer dark period, a lower stocking density at housing, more enrichment, and access to a veranda should be considered as influencing factors.
Related Concept Videos
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...

