Familial risk of major mood disorders and brain functional connectivity in the default mode, cognitive executive, and
Daniel Murage1, Anna Nazarova1, Vladislav Drobinin1
1From the Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Murage, Nazarova, Drobonin, Adepalli, Helmick, Newman, Uher); the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, N.S. (Murage, Nazarova, Adepalli, Uher); the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Schmidt, Bowen).
Background:
Mood disorders, including depressive and bipolar disorders, begin in late adolescence to early adulthood, tend to run in families, and present early with subthreshold symptoms. They have been associated with differential connectivity in 3 core networks: the default mode network (DMN), cognitive executive network (CEN), and salience network (SN), but it remains unclear whether differences in connectivity in the DMN, CEN, and SN are associated with familial risk for mood disorders.
Methods:
We recruited youth aged 9-19 years, including offspring of parents with major depressive or bipolar disorders (familial high risk [FHR]) and offspring of parents with no mood disorder (controls) for a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. We tested associations between family history of major mood disorders and connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN.
Results:
We included 215 youth: 126 at FHR with a mean age of 13.38 (standard deviation [SD] 2.91) years and 79 controls with a mean age of 13.17 (SD 2.67) years. Mean connectivity in the DMN (β = 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.023 to 0.029), CEN (β = -0.009, 95% CI, -0.070 to 0.089), and SN (β = -0.010, 95% CI -0.071 to 0.051) in the FHR group was similar to that of controls. Moreover, DMN, CEN, and SN connectivity was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms.
Limitations:
Given that brain connectivity changes over the developmental period, longitudinal studies would improve understanding of how this change occurs in familial risk groups to identify critical time periods for intervention or prevention of mood disorders.
Conclusion:
Connectivity within and between the DMN, CEN, and SN is not a neural indicator of familial risk for major mood disorders.
More Related Videos
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
12:09Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Published on: August 5, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Bipolar Disorder
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Depression: Overview
Biological Causes of Schizophrenia
Genetic Factors in Schizophrenia
The genetic basis of schizophrenia is strongly supported by family and twin...
