Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

An Improved Method for the Preparation of Type I Collagen From Skin
Published on: January 21, 2014
Efficacy and Safety of Collagen Filler for Intradermal Injection: A Randomized Prospective Controlled Multicenter
Sile Shen1,2, Siwei Qu1, Mingdian Wang1,2
1Plastic Surgery Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No. 2 Cherry Garden East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Background:
With the increasing demand for minimally invasive aesthetic procedures, intradermal injection has emerged as a promising method to improve skin condition. However, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of intradermal collagen injections.
Objective:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the improvement of facial skin and safety of collagen intradermal injections.
Methods:
This prospective, multicenter, randomized, assessor-masked clinical trial enrolled 480 subjects aged 18-65 seeking facial skin enhancement. Subjects were randomized into treatment (n = 240) and control (n = 240) groups. The treatment group received three sessions of intradermal collagen injections at four-week intervals. Assessments included the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), composite scale for skin dryness and dull complexion, Allergan Fine Lines Scale (AFLS), Allergan Skin Roughness Scale (ASRS), skin hydration, elasticity, and safety evaluations.
Results:
The GAIS and skin improvement rates showed significant differences between groups (P < 0.0001), with the treatment group demonstrating superior efficacy. No significant differences were observed in skin hydration and elasticity (P > 0.05). The treatment group exhibited higher improvement rates in GAIS, dull complexion, fine lines, and skin roughness at 4 weeks post-final injection compared to the control group. No severe treatment-emergent adverse events related to the trial device occurred.
Conclusion:
Intradermal collagen injections significantly enhance skin texture and demonstrate safety and reliability in clinical settings, offering a favorable risk-benefit ratio for appropriate candidates.
Level Of Evidence I:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
More Related Videos
11:13Assessment of Viability of Human Fat Injection into Nude Mice with Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: January 7, 2015
08:43Recombinant Collagen I Peptide Microcarriers for Cell Expansion and Their Potential Use As Cell Delivery System in a Bioreactor Model
Published on: February 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections