Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

14.7K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
14.7K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.5K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.5K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

41.9K
Overview
41.9K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

11.4K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
11.4K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

8.0K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nipping Fraud in the Bud? Challenges for Detecting and Managing Issues of Research Integrity Before Publication.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026
Same author

In Response to: Reflections on ECPR in New Zealand: Past, Present and Future.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2025
Same author

Authorship and Its Virtues.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2025
Same author

The central limit theorem: the remarkable theory that explains all of statistics.

Anaesthesia·2024
Same author

The winner's curse: why large effect sizes in discovery trials always get smaller and often disappear completely.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

Interpreting frequentist hypothesis tests: insights from Bayesian inference.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·2023
Same journal

Inflammatory Indices and Pediatric Emergence Delirium: Predictive Signal or Statistical Artifact?

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 1-One Center's 15 Year Evolution in Eligibility, Utilization, Efficiency, and Outcomes.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Retrospective Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Video Laryngoscope System for Tracheal Intubation in Infants and Neonates.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 2-One Center's 15 Year Experience Improving Quality and Safety Outcomes.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Response to: Reliability of the Pediatric Specific ASA Physical Status Classification.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 4-Evolving Solutions in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: From Registries to a Learning Health System Approach.

Paediatric anaesthesia·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Flipping the Conditional: Why We Are Probably Wrong About Probabilities.

David Sidebotham1,2, Tim Dare3

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia and the Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Paediatric Anaesthesia
|May 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Flipping the conditional, a reasoning error in conditional probability, leads to misinterpreting diagnostic tests and legal evidence. Understanding this fallacy is crucial for accurate medical and legal decision-making.

Keywords:
Bayes' theoremcognitive biasprobabilityprosecutor's fallacystatistics as a topic

More Related Videos

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.9K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.9K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Legal Reasoning

Background:

  • Conditional probability is fundamental in assessing event likelihoods.
  • Errors in conditional probability, termed 'flipping the conditional,' can have severe consequences.
  • This fallacy is often encountered with rare events and misinterpretations of diagnostic tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and explain the error of 'flipping the conditional.'
  • To illustrate how this error leads to misinterpreting diagnostic test results.
  • To discuss its relevance in legal contexts, such as the 'prosecutor's fallacy,' with real-world examples.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual explanation of conditional probability.
  • Analysis of common errors in transposing terms within conditional probabilities.
  • Illustrative examples from clinical diagnostics and legal cases.

Main Results:

  • 'Flipping the conditional' occurs when sensitivity is confused with positive predictive value.
  • This error contributes to the 'prosecutor's fallacy,' confusing guilt probability with evidence probability.
  • The fallacy is particularly prevalent when dealing with rare events.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding 'flipping the conditional' is vital for accurate interpretation of medical tests.
  • This reasoning error has significant implications in legal proceedings, affecting the interpretation of statistical evidence.
  • Awareness of this fallacy can prevent miscarriages of justice and improve diagnostic accuracy.