Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025
Step-by-Step Stapedotomy through Transcanal Exclusive Endoscopic Approach
Published on: March 5, 2022
Credibility of Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Otolaryngology Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements: A
Maryann Zhao1,2, Lucy Xu3, Deborah Goss3
1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective:
Anchor-based approaches for determining a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are critical for detecting meaningful changes in clinical status. However, the methodologies for MCID determination vary across the literature and have been found to be inconsistent. Our objective is to evaluate the credibility of anchor-based MCIDs in otolaryngology.
Data Sources:
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.
Review Methods:
Studies identifying novel anchor-based MCIDs for PROMs in otolaryngology from inception to November 2, 2021, in a previous review were included. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for original articles on the same topic from November 3, 2021, to January 4, 2024. The credibility of MCIDs was assessed using a previously developed instrument with five main criteria, including anchor interpretability and relevance to patients, correlation between the anchor and the patient-reported outcome, sample size, and determination if the selected anchor threshold is small and meaningful.
Results:
In total, 43 studies reported anchor-based MCIDs in otolaryngology. A total of 74 MCIDs were identified across subspecialties, most commonly in rhinology (38%) and otology (26%). Only 25% (18/74) were deemed credible, whereas 48% (35/74) had low credibility. In 34% (24/74) of cases, correlations between the anchor and PROMs were not reported. Most MCIDs (70%) were calculated using differences in their anchors that were considered sufficiently small and clinically relevant to patients. All MCIDs were calculated using at least an anchor-based method, with 50 (58%) relying on the mean change anchor-based method.
Conclusion:
A small subset of MCIDs for PROMs in otolaryngology were found to be credible. These findings highlight the need for more rigorous methods and standardized guidelines for defining MCIDs, ensuring that criteria, such as sufficient sample size and appropriate anchor thresholds, are met.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:09Odds Ratio
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...