Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counting fast or slow, aloud or silently? A comparison of adult stutterers and non-stutterers.

Cognitive processing·2020
Same author

One psychological second does not necessarily last 1000 ms.

PsyCh journal·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Studying the Processing of Multimodal Brief Temporal Intervals with an Equisection (Bisection) Task.

Antoine Demers1, Simon Grondin1

  • 1École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6.

Multisensory Research
|May 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study found that discriminating time intervals is most accurate using only auditory signals. Multimodal sensory inputs, especially involving tactile and visual stimuli, increase time perception variability and alter perceived duration.

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes
09:27

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Previous research explored auditory and visual influences on time perception.
  • Limited studies examined multisensory time discrimination with identical stimuli or included tactile input.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate multimodal sensory influences on discriminating adjacent time intervals.
  • Examine the impact of different sensory marker combinations (auditory, visual, tactile) on temporal discrimination accuracy and perceived duration.

Main Methods:

  • Employed an equisection and adjustment method for temporal discrimination.
  • Participants adjusted a second signal to equalize two successive empty intervals.
  • Tested nine modality conditions with four standard interval durations (0.5s to 2s).

Main Results:

  • Temporal adjustment accuracy was highest with three auditory markers, followed by visual, then tactile.
  • Intermodal conditions (mixed sensory markers) showed lower accuracy than unimodal conditions.
  • Perceived duration varied across intermodal conditions, with tactile-visual sequences often perceived as longer.
  • Short intermodal intervals increased variability, and visual processing speed influenced perceived duration.

Conclusions:

  • Unimodal auditory sensory input optimizes temporal interval discrimination.
  • Multisensory integration affects time perception, introducing variability and altering perceived duration.
  • The processing speed of visual stimuli plays a significant role in subjective time perception.