Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Out of Lab Longitudinal Gait Assessment of Participants Pre and Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Tomer Yona1, Bezalel Peskin2, Arielle Fischer1
11Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Objective:
To evaluate the longitudinal changes in knee sagittal kinematics pre- and post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during varying walking speeds in non-laboratory environments. A secondary objective describing the hip and ankle joint kinematics.
Design:
Longitudinal observational study.
Setting:
Hospital.
Patients Or Other Participants:
Forty ACLR patients and 17 healthy matched controls were recruited.
Main Outcome Measure(S):
Knee joint sagittal kinematics measured using seven inertial measurement units at pre-surgery, three-, and five-months post-surgery while walking at slow, normal, and fast speeds.
Results:
At pre-surgery, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee exhibited greater minimum flexion during normal and fast walking (p≤.008) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak (p=.006). SPM revealed significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.033). Compared to controls, the injured knee had greater minimum flexion during normal and slow walking (p≤.025). At three months, compared to the contralateral limb, the injured knee showed increased minimum flexion across all speeds (p≤.005) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during fast walking (p<.001). SPM indicated significant differences throughout the gait cycle at all speeds (p≤.028). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle across all speeds (p<.001) and exhibited less knee flexion at the first peak during slow walking (p=.031). At five months, differences between limbs were reduced, with significant differences in minimum flexion at all speeds (p≤.027). SPM differences were limited to specific gait cycle portions during normal and fast walking (p≤.011). Compared to controls, the injured knee remained more flexed at the minimum angle during slow and normal walking (p≤.005). Lastly, hip adaptations resolved while ankle asymmetries persisted during terminal stance.
Conclusions:
ACLR patients demonstrated progressive improvements in knee sagittal kinematics, indicating a recovery trend. However, the recovery was non-linear across different walking speeds.
More Related Videos
06:28Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
Published on: September 2, 2025
06:27Author Spotlight: Investigating Early Events and Long-Term Effects of ACL Injuries for Osteoarthritis Progression
Published on: September 29, 2023