Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
71.3K
Workplace Violence (KWVS®13): scale development and validation in the Korean context.
Da-Yee Jeung1, Hyoung Ryoul Kim2, Hansoo Song3
1Department of Dental Hygiene, Hanyang Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
|May 28, 2025
Summary
The revised Korean Workplace Violence Scale (KWVS®13) effectively measures workplace violence intensity and magnitude. This validated tool aids in identifying risk groups and developing targeted workplace safety strategies.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Psychometrics
- Industrial-Organizational Psychology
Background:
- Workplace violence encompasses a range of aggressive behaviors, including physical violence, verbal abuse, and bullying.
- Existing measures may not adequately capture the nuances of workplace violence in the Korean context.
- There is a need for a validated instrument to assess the intensity and types of workplace violence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a revised Korean Workplace Violence Scale (KWVS®13).
- To provide a reliable and objective tool for assessing workplace violence in Korea.
- To establish sex-specific cutoff values for identifying workplace violence risk.
Main Methods:
- The 24-item Korean Workplace Violence Scale (KWVS-24) was revised through expert review, resulting in the 13-item KWVS®13.
- A survey of 359 service industry workers assessed the reliability and validity of KWVS®13, alongside burnout and depression.
- Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine sex-specific risk cutoff values.
Main Results:
- KWVS®13 comprises 13 items across four subscales: psychological/sexual violence (from customers and internal sources), physical assault, and organizational protective systems.
- The scale demonstrated good validity (content validity ratio: 0.888; convergent/discriminant validity: 100%) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.827-0.860).
- Significant correlations were found between KWVS®13 subscales and burnout/depression, with sex-specific reference values for risk assessment.
Conclusions:
- The KWVS®13 is a robust and valid instrument for quantitatively assessing workplace violence.
- It provides a reliable framework for evaluating workplace violence across diverse professional settings.
- The scale aids in objective assessment and informs the development of targeted workplace violence prevention strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
28.1K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
28.1K
Group Design
9.7K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.7K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
9
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
9
Data Validation
5.5K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.5K
Reliability and Validity
13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Survey Safety
184
Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
184

