Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Navigating leadership dilemmas: neural mechanisms balancing social approval and group performance
Daeeun Kim1, JuYoung Kim2, Kun Il Kim2
1Department of Psychology, Korea Army Academy at Yeongcheon, 495, Hoguk-ro, Gogyeong-myeon, Yeongcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 38900, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Leaders often face a dilemma when balancing the prioritization of group performance with gaining social approval from group members, a tension that can have significant consequences for the entire group. Despite its importance, the neural mechanisms underlying this leadership dilemma have not been thoroughly explored. In this study, participants, ostensibly designated as leaders of a group with 2 other members, engaged in a puzzle choice task that presented a conflict between group performance and social approval, all within either a public or a private setting. Leaders showed a preference for choices that prioritized social approval over group performance in public settings more than in private settings. When managing these dilemmas, relationship-oriented leaders engaged the ventral subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex, while goal-oriented leaders engaged the dorsal subregion. These findings contribute to our understanding of how the human brain navigates strategic leadership decisions, particularly in scenarios demanding a delicate balance between popularity and group performance.
Related Concept Videos
Groupthink
Social Loafing
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Social Proof
