Social vulnerability and triage acuity among pregnant people seeking unscheduled hospital care
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Lakha Prasannan1, Alejandro Alvarez2,3, Disha Shahani2,3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Winthrop Hospital, NYU Langone Health, Mineola, NY, USA.
Objectives:
This study examines the association between census tract-linked social vulnerability index (SVI) and maternal-fetal triage index (MFTI), a standardized score used to classify obstetric triage visit acuity.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included patients at 20 weeks of gestational age or greater presenting to a New York City obstetric triage unit from March 2019 to April 2021, analyzing only the first pregnancy per patient. Exclusions included missing SVI or MFTI data and MFTI-5 (scheduled services). The primary exposure was SVI, and the primary outcome was MFTI score at the first triage visit. Multinomial logistic regression modeled the odds of MFTI-1 (stat) and MFTI-2 (urgent) visits relative to prompt/non-urgent visits, adjusting for potential confounders.
Results:
Among 11,388 pregnant patients, most triage visits were classified as prompt or non-urgent (61.5 %), while 35.1 % were urgent, and 3.4 % were stat. Patients from neighborhoods with very high SVI had increased odds of an urgent visit (aOR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.06-1.41), as did those with chronic hypertension (aOR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.18-1.81), though SVI was not associated with stat visits. Stat visits were more likely during the COVID-19 pandemic (aOR 5.42, 95 % CI 4.04-7.28) and among patients with chronic hypertension (aOR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.15-2.94), while nulliparity and term presentation were associated with lower odds of a stat visit.
Conclusions:
Patients living in areas with a very high SVI score had increased odds of urgent triage visits but not stat visits. No racial or ethnic disparities were observed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Bystander Effect
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...

