Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Correlation between Plane Assessment of Prolapse Degree and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Scores after
Lifan Shen1,2, Huijun Bai1, Xueyu Sun1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract:
Objectives: This study aimed to combine dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and form a plane based on osseous structures to evaluate the degree of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The correlation of this novel evaluation approach with the POP-Q system was assessed.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 POP patients with POP-Q stage ≥II. The dynamic MRI images of those patients were reconstructed in three dimensions. A plane was created by using the midpoint of the line between the inferior margins of the two pubic bones and the starting points of the superior margins of the bilateral sacrotuberous ligaments (the pubic inferior midpoint - sacrotuberous ligament starting point superior edge plane). Distances from the lowest point of the anterior vaginal wall, cervix, and rectal ampulla to this evaluation plane were measured, modeled, and categorized. The consistency and correlation of the categorized results with POP-Q scores were verified by performing a kappa analysis and Spearman's rank correlation analysis, respectively.
Results:
The highest consistency with POP-Q scores was found in the prolapse of the central pelvic cavity (kappa = 0.713, p < 0.05), followed by the anterior POP (kappa = 0.427, p < 0.05), and posterior POP (kappa = 0.261, p < 0.05), with all showing statistically significant differences. The strongest positive correlation was observed between central POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.864, p < 0.01), followed by posterior POP and POP-Q scores (r = 0.710, p < 0.01), with both exhibiting a strong positive correlation. Anterior POP and POP-Q scores showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.586, p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
The results of the proposed evaluation method were highly consistent in the anterior and central pelvic cavities and strongly correlated in the central and posterior pelvic cavities. In particular, the assessment of the posterior cavity showed a strong positive correlation with that of the POP-Q system. The evaluation plane demonstrated high consistency and correlation with the POP-Q system.
.More Related Videos
07:41Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
03:30Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Muscles of the Pelvic Floor and Perineum
Perineal Layer
The perineum is a diamond-shaped area below the pelvic diaphragm, divided into an anterior urogenital triangle that contains the external genitals and a posterior anal triangle housing the anus. The urogenital...