Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Revascularization Strategies in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Disease: Temporal Trends,
Felix Lindberg1, Brynjölfur Mogensen2, Sergio Buccheri3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Insights
Complete revascularization (CR) increased in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD). Both angiographic and physiology-guided CR were linked to better outcomes, including reduced mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Randomized trials support complete revascularization (CR) over incomplete revascularization (IR) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease (MVD).
- The clinical practice implementation of CR strategies remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess temporal trends in revascularization strategies for STEMI patients with MVD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
- To evaluate the association of different revascularization strategies with patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 20,131 patients from the SWEDEHEART registry undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD (2009-2021).
- Primary outcome: composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization, landmarked at 90 days.
- Compared outcomes for angiographic CR, physiology-guided CR, and incomplete revascularization (IR).
Main Results:
- Adoption of CR increased from 33% in 2009 to 51% in 2021; physiology-guided CR rose from 0% to 14%.
- Adjusted analysis showed lower risk of primary events with angiographic CR vs. IR (aHR: 0.84) and physiology-guided CR vs. IR (aHR: 0.80).
- No significant difference in outcomes between physiology-guided CR and angiographic CR was observed (aHR: 0.94).
Conclusions:
- CR, including physiology-guided procedures, has seen increased implementation in STEMI patients with MVD.
- Both angiographic and physiology-guided CR are independently associated with favorable clinical outcomes.
- These findings support the broader adoption of CR strategies in clinical practice.
Background:
Randomized trials support angiographic and physiology-guided complete revascularization (CR) vs incomplete revascularization (IR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel disease (MVD). The implementation of these strategies in clinical practice is uncertain.
Objectives:
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD, we assessed temporal trends in the utilization of different revascularization strategies and associated outcomes.
Methods:
We included 20,131 patients from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI with MVD between 2009 and 2021. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization, landmarked at 90 days postindex to account for staged procedures during this time.
Results:
We observed increased adoption of CR (2009: 33% [n = 397 of 1,217]; 2015: 46% [n = 767 of 1,658]; 2021: 51% [n = 816 of 1,603]; P-trend < 0.001) and physiology-guided CR (2009: 0% [n = 0 of 1,217]; 2015: 7% [n = 119 of 1,658]; 2021: 14% [n = 218 of 1,603]; P-trend < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 4.2 years (Q1-Q3: 1.8-7.1 years), the adjusted risk of a primary event was lower with angiographic CR vs IR (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79-0.89) and physiology-guided CR vs IR (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93) but not physiology-guided CR vs angiographic CR (aHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.80-1.11).
Conclusions:
In patients with STEMI and MVD, the implementation of CR and physiology-guided procedures increased over time. As of 2021, 51% of patients underwent CR and 14% physiology-guided CR. CR, whether angiographically or physiology guided, was independently associated with favorable outcomes, including mortality.
More Related Videos
04:30A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management