Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Responsiveness of different MET tumour alterations to type I and type II MET inhibitors
Yonina R Murciano-Goroff1, Valentina Foglizzo2,3, Jason Chang4
1Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Background:
Mutations in c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) can be primary oncogenic drivers of multiple tumour types or can be acquired as mechanisms of resistance to therapy. MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are classified as type I or type II inhibitors, with the former binding to the DFG-in, active conformation of MET, and the latter to the DFG-out, inactive conformation of MET. Understanding how the different classes of MET TKIs impact tumours with varied MET alterations is critical to optimising treatment for patients with MET altered cancers. Here, we characterise MET mutations identified in patients' tumours and assess responsiveness to type I and II TKIs.
Methods:
We used structural modelling, in vitro kinase and in cell-based assays to assess the response of MET mutations to type I and II TKIs. We then translated our pre-clinical findings and treated patients with MET mutant tumours with selected inhibitors.
Results:
We detected the emergence of four (three previously uncharacterised and one known) MET resistance mutations (METG1090A, METD1213H, METR1227K and a METY1230S) in samples from patients with multiple solid tumours, including patients who had been previously treated with type I inhibitors. In silico modelling and biochemical assays across a variety of MET alterations, including the uncharacterised METG1090A and the METY1230S substitutions, demonstrated impaired binding of type I but not of type II TKIs (i.e., cabozantinib/foretinib). Applying our pre-clinical findings, we then treated two patients (one with a non-small-cell lung cancer and one with a renal cell carcinoma) whose tumours harboured these previously uncharacterised MET alterations with cabozantinib, a type II MET TKI, and observed clinical responses.
Conclusions:
Comprehensive characterisation of the sensitivity of mutations to different TKI classes in oncogenic kinases may guide clinical intervention and overcome resistance to targeted therapies in selected cases.
Key Points:
Kinase mutations in RTKs are primary or secondary drivers in multiple cancer types Some of these mutations confer resistance to type I but not to type II inhibitors in preclinical samples and in patients The biochemical characterization of mutations in oncogenic kinases based on their sensitivity to type I and type II inhibitors is crucial to inform clinical intervention.
Insights
New MET resistance mutations were identified in patients with solid tumors. Type II tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed efficacy against these mutations, guiding targeted therapy for MET-altered cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Mutations in the c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) drive cancer or confer resistance to therapy.
- MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are categorized as type I (DFG-in) or type II (DFG-out).
- Understanding TKI class impact on diverse MET alterations is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize novel MET resistance mutations.
- To assess the response of various MET alterations to type I and type II TKIs.
- To evaluate the clinical efficacy of type II TKIs in patients with MET-mutant cancers.
Main Methods:
- Structural modeling, in vitro kinase assays, and cell-based assays were employed.
- Pre-clinical findings were translated to patient treatment.
- Selected MET inhibitors were administered to patients with MET-mutant tumors.
Main Results:
- Four MET resistance mutations (three novel) were identified in patients with solid tumors, some previously treated with type I TKIs.
- In silico and biochemical assays showed type II TKIs (cabozantinib/foretinib) retained activity against novel MET mutations (METG1090A, METY1230S), unlike type I TKIs.
- Two patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma harboring uncharacterized MET alterations responded to cabozantinib therapy.
Conclusions:
- Comprehensive characterization of mutation sensitivity to TKI classes can guide clinical intervention.
- Targeted therapies can be optimized to overcome resistance in MET-altered cancers.
- Biochemical profiling of kinase mutations against TKI classes is vital for informed clinical decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

