Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Income inequality depresses support for higher minimum wages
Daniela Goya-Tocchetto1, M Asher Lawson2, Shai Davidai3
1Department of Organization and Human Resources, School of Management, University at Buffalo.
Rising income inequality reduces public demand for higher minimum wages. This occurs because people psychologically reason that current earnings dictate future earning potential, decreasing support for wage increases.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Labor Economics
- Public Policy
Background:
- Economic inequality is rising globally.
- Public demand for higher minimum wages has not kept pace with income disparities.
- Minimum wage policies are a key tool for addressing economic inequality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between economic inequality and public demand for minimum wage increases.
- To identify the psychological mechanisms underlying public support for minimum wage policies.
- To explore interventions to counteract decreased support for higher minimum wages.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of protest attendance data in the U.S. over six and a half years (N = 130,562).
- Eight laboratory experiments, including a U.S. nationally representative sample (N = 7,286), to establish causal links.
- Psychological assessments to measure "is-to-ought" reasoning.
Main Results:
- Higher economic inequality correlated with fewer and less-attended protests for minimum wage increases.
- Causal evidence shows increased income inequality significantly decreases support for higher minimum wages.
- The "is-to-ought" reasoning bias, where current earnings influence perceived fair earnings, was identified as a key factor.
Conclusions:
- Economic inequality can suppress public demand for policies aimed at reducing it, such as minimum wage hikes.
- Psychological "is-to-ought" reasoning plays a critical role in diminishing support for higher minimum wages.
- Interventions can mitigate this psychological effect, with implications for effective policy communication strategies.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
09:37Chronic Stress Shifts Effort-Related Choice Behavior in a Y-Maze Barrier Task in Mice
Published on: August 13, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Measures of Central Tendency
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Benefits of Self-Esteem
Close Relationships and Culture
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Equity Theory