Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are lateral differences in word processing modulated by concreteness, imageability, both, or neither?

R Bruyer, F Racquez

    The International Journal of Neuroscience
    |August 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The cognitive approach to familiar face processing in human subjects.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Age decisions on familiar and unfamiliar faces.

    Behavioural processes·2014
    Same author

    Hypothyroidism and major depression: a common executive dysfunction?

    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2006
    Same author

    Anxiety and depression, attention, and executive functions in hypothyroidism.

    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2005
    Same author

    The Ponzo illusion with auditory substitution of vision in sighted and early-blind subjects.

    Perception·2005
    Same author

    When audition alters vision: an event-related potential study of the cross-modal interactions between faces and voices.

    Neuroscience letters·2004

    The study investigated visual field superiority in word processing. While a right visual field advantage typically exists, highly imageable words may reduce this effect, particularly in males, suggesting hemispheric specialization for word properties.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Psycholinguistics
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Normal subjects typically exhibit right visual field superiority (RVS) in word processing.
    • The influence of word imageability and concreteness on RVS is not fully understood.
    • These word properties are often correlated, necessitating separate investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine whether imageability or concreteness is the primary factor influencing RVS.
    • To investigate the separate effects of imageability and concreteness on visual field advantages in word processing tasks.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted with normal subjects performing lexical decision and word reading tasks.
    • Stimuli were laterally displayed words, varying in imageability and concreteness.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Behavioral data (accuracy, reaction time) and error patterns were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • A general right visual field advantage was observed in both experiments.
    • Neither imageability nor concreteness significantly affected RVS in the lexical decision task.
    • In the word reading task, RVS was reduced for highly imageable words in males, though this interaction was complex.

    Conclusions:

    • Hemispheric specialization may play a role, with the right hemisphere potentially sensitive to word imageability.
    • The left hemisphere might be more attuned to word concreteness.
    • Further research is needed to clarify the interaction between word properties, visual field, and sex differences in word processing.