Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

In Vivo Mouse Model of Spinal Implant Infection
Published on: June 23, 2020
Financial and Clinical Toxicity of Empiric Vancomycin for Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Cohort Study
Laura M Ebbitt1,2, Jeremy D VanHoose1,2, Samantha Manci1,2
1Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Abstract:
Background: Vancomycin for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) should be reserved for healthcare-acquired infections, history of multiple interventions, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The MRSA incidence is low; however, fear of missing MRSA leads to overutilization. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated the cost and risks of empiric vancomycin for IAI. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of MRSA-positive culture and surveillance testing. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence, progression to dialysis, direct costs of vancomycin overutilization, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 1,045 patients with IAI were identified and 491 (47%) received at least one dose of vancomycin. Thirty patients (2.9%) grew MRSA. Of those who grew MRSA, 21 (70%) were MRSA positive on the surveillance multi-drug resistance (MDR) culture or by polymerase chain reaction during hospitalization. There were no deaths within the MRSA group. AKI developed in 351 (33.6%) patients during their hospitalization, with 49.6% occurring within 48 hours of vancomycin administration. Of the 65 patients (6.9%) who required dialysis, 27 patients (42%) received vancomycin. The cost of unnecessary doses equated to $21,655 and $188,643.84 for vancomycin levels. Conclusion: Given the low MRSA culture incidence, it is reasonable to avoid vancomycin as empiric treatment for those being admitted for IAI alone to reduce the risk of AKI and reduce healthcare costs. Vancomycin should be limited mainly to those with a positive MRSA culture with consideration of vancomycin in those at highest MRSA risk such as a history of MRSA or known MRSA colonization.
Insights
Empiric vancomycin for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) is often overused, despite low methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) rates. Avoiding vancomycin for IAI can reduce acute kidney injury (AKI) risk and healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Vancomycin use for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) is recommended for specific indications like healthcare-acquired infections or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presence.
- Overutilization of vancomycin for IAI occurs due to concerns about missing MRSA, despite its low incidence.
- This practice contributes to increased healthcare costs and potential patient harm.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost and risks associated with the empiric use of vancomycin for intra-abdominal infections (IAI).
- To determine the actual incidence of MRSA-positive cultures in IAI patients.
- To assess secondary outcomes including acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis requirements, and associated costs.
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted.
- 1,045 patients with IAI were analyzed.
- Data collected included vancomycin administration, MRSA culture results, surveillance testing, AKI incidence, dialysis, costs, length of stay, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Out of 1,045 patients, 491 (47%) received vancomycin; only 30 (2.9%) had MRSA-positive cultures.
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) developed in 33.6% of patients, with nearly half occurring within 48 hours of vancomycin administration.
- Unnecessary vancomycin use incurred significant costs ($21,655 for doses, $188,643.84 for levels).
Conclusions:
- Given the low incidence of MRSA in IAI, empiric vancomycin use is often unnecessary and should be avoided.
- Restricting vancomycin to patients with confirmed MRSA or high-risk colonization can mitigate risks like AKI and reduce healthcare expenditures.
- This approach optimizes antibiotic stewardship and patient safety in managing intra-abdominal infections.
More Related Videos
06:02A Contemporary Warming/Restraining Device for Efficient Tail Vein Injections in a Murine Fungal Sepsis Model
Published on: November 6, 2020
09:09Treatment with Vancomycin Loaded Calcium Sulphate and Autogenous Bone in an Improved Rabbit Model of Bone Infection
Published on: March 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions