Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Yeast As a Chassis for Developing Functional Assays to Study Human P53
Published on: August 4, 2019
Prognostic Landscape of TP53 Mutations in Hematologic Malignancies
Seo Yoon Jang1, Joowon Jang2, Jee-Soo Lee2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Purpose:
While TP53 mutations are well known to be associated with adverse prognosis in hematological diseases, their functional impact remains incompletely understood. This study examines the spectrum of TP53 mutations across various hematologic malignancies and evaluates their functional impact.
Materials And Methods:
Using targeted sequencing panels, we analyzed TP53 mutations in the bone marrow aspiration samples of a retrospective cohort of 856 patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies. To assess the impact of TP53 mutations, we applied the evolutionary action (EAp53) score and the relative fitness score (RFS), previously proposed functional scoring methods. The effects of variant allele frequency (VAF), disruptive mutations, EAp53 score, and RFS on overall survival (OS) were evaluated.
Results:
TP53 mutations were associated with inferior OS compared with wildtype TP53 (median OS 10.0 months versus not estimable; hazard ratio (HR) 4.6; p<0.001). In the acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome subgroups, TP53 mutations had a significant adverse impact on OS. (HRs 3.8, 4.2, 6.0, respectively; p<0.001, p=0.005, p<0.001, respectively). Patients with VAF >50% had significantly poorer OS compared to those with VAF ≤50% (median OS 7.5 months versus 22.8 months; HR 2.2, p=0.016). Moreover, patients in the high-risk RFS group (RFS >0.22) had significantly worse OS compared to those in the low-risk RFS group (RFS ≤0.22) (median OS 5.6 months versus 16.3 months; HR 2.2, p=0.041). However, no significant survival difference was observed between the EAp53 high-risk (>75) and low-risk (≤75) groups, or between patients with disruptive and non-disruptive mutations.
Conclusion:
Our findings highlight VAF and RFS as valuable tools for stratifying TP53-mutant patients into high-risk and low-risk groups.
More Related Videos
11:15Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
09:33Author Spotlight: Finding New Therapeutic Targets for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Through Genome-Scale shRNA Screens
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Abnormal Proliferation
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...