Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Reframing the responsibility gap in medical artificial intelligence: insights from causal selection and authorship
Kristian G Barman1, Pawel Pawlowski2, Jasper Debrabander2
1Ghent University Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Gent, Belgium kristiancampbell.gonzalezbarman@ugent.be.
None:
The increasing use of AI in healthcare has sparked debates about responsibility and accountability for AI-related errors. The difficulty in attributing moral responsibility for undesirable outcomes caused by increasingly autonomous (often opaque) AI systems has become a new focal point in the debate on 'responsibility gaps'. We approach the problem of these gaps by offering a framework that combines causal selection principles from the philosophy of science with recent accounts of authorship attribution in AI contexts. We argue this framework offers a more comprehensive and context-sensitive approach to the responsibility gap in medical AI.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Motivational Bias
Halo Effect
Altruism