Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Differences in Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP) Panometry Patterns Among Obese and Bariatric Surgery Patients
Anh D Nguyen1, Ambreen Merchant2, Anjali Bhatt3
1Baylor Scott & White Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Background:
During pre-bariatric surgery evaluation, we routinely perform objective testing for GERD (endoscopy, pH monitoring if no reflux esophagitis found) with high-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) to evaluate esophageal motility. In this study, we aimed to identify differences in FLIP metrics between obese patients with and without GERD.
Methods:
We reviewed our clinical database of obese patients evaluated for bariatric surgery, including surgery-naïve patients and patients who had sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) that resulted in inadequate weight loss. We recorded GERD symptoms, HRM findings, and FLIP metrics (EGJ-diameter, distensibility index, and contractile response patterns). Patients with reflux esophagitis or acid exposure time (AET) > 6% were considered GERD+; those with AET ≤ 6% were deemed GERD.
Key Results:
We included 160 patients (mean age 50.2 ± 12.4 years; 79% women; 66 surgery-naïve) (29 GERD-, 37 GERD+), 70 SG (20 GERD-, 50 GERD+), 24 RYGB (16 GERD-, 8 GERD+). FLIP abnormalities were frequent, including reduced EGJ opening (REO) (12.1% surgery-naïve, 14.3% SG, 12.5% RYGB) and abnormal contractile response (59.1% surgery-naïve, 71.4% SG, 62.5% RYGB). FLIP differences were found between GERD+ and GERD- patients: REO (8.0% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.02) and BCR (2.0% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.02) were both less frequent in GERD+ than in GERD- SG patients. SRCR was more frequent in GERD- than in GERD+ surgery-naïve patients (31.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
While FLIP differences between GERD- and GERD+ patients exist, there were no FLIP metrics that clearly predicted GERD in obese patients either before or after bariatric surgery.
More Related Videos
04:05Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
Published on: August 22, 2025
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:29Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
01:29Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
01:29Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.