Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

08:50
Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
12.3K
Left Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy vs. Conventional Sternotomy in On-Pump Multivessel Coronary Revascularization
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kırklareli Training and Research Hospital, Kırklareli, Turkey.
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
|May 30, 2025
Summary
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using left anterior mini-thoracotomy offers shorter hospital stays and faster recovery compared to conventional sternotomy. This approach is effective for multivessel coronary revascularization with comparable safety.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Conventional sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with significant morbidity.
- Minimally invasive techniques aim to reduce surgical trauma and improve patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of on-pump multivessel coronary revascularization using left anterior mini-thoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 262 patients undergoing on-pump multivessel CABG.
- Group I: 132 patients (minimally invasive left anterior mini-thoracotomy).
- Group II: 130 patients (conventional full sternotomy).
- Comparison of intraoperative, postoperative, and mortality parameters.
Main Results:
- Minimally invasive group (Group I) had significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass (152.24 ± 36.4 min) and cross-clamping times (86 ± 13.2 min) (P<0.001).
- Group I demonstrated significantly shorter intensive care (P=0.005) and hospital stays (P=0.004).
- Perioperative mortality was similar between groups (1 patient each), with comparable bleeding requiring revision.
Conclusions:
- Left anterior mini-thoracotomy is an effective and reliable method for multivessel CABG.
- Benefits include reduced drainage, less need for blood transfusion, shorter hospitalizations, and improved cosmetic results.
- This approach facilitates a faster return to daily life compared to conventional sternotomy.

