Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster
Emily G McDonald1,2, Justine L Estey3, Cody Davenport3
1Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Importance:
Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is common, costly, and harmful. Deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is a priority for improving the health outcomes of older adults. PIP is especially common in long-term care homes, with up to 88% of residents affected.
Objective:
To assess the efficacy of electronic decision support for deprescribing in long-term care.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial took place from August 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed older adults residing in 1 of 5 long-term care homes in New Brunswick, Canada, at the start of the study who were prescribed 1 or more PIMs. The 5 long-term care homes were divided into 3 clusters. All clusters spent at least 3 months in a control phase; every 3 months a cluster was randomized to enter the intervention phase. Data analysis was performed from October 15, 2023, to March 24, 2025.
Interventions:
Electronically generated, individualized reports that contained prioritized opportunities for deprescribing in older adults were paired with preexisting quarterly medication reviews. Deprescribing reports were accessed through a secure viewer.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was the proportion of residents with 1 or more PIMs deprescribed in the control phase vs intervention measured every 3 months after a medication review. For the primary outcome, an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was calculated using a generalized linear model with a logit link, controlling for the effect of the intervention and adjusted for the number of PIMs, age, sex, language, and period as fixed effects and participants nested within sites as random effects.
Results:
A total of 725 residents participated in the study (median [IQR] age, 84 [76-90] years; 478 [65.9%] female). The median (IQR) number of medications was 10 (7-13), and the median (IQR) number of PIMs was 3 (2-4). In the control phase, the proportion of residents with 1 or more PIMs deprescribed was 92 of 725 (12.7%) compared with 226 of 621 (36.4%) during the intervention (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.34), in favor of the intervention.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This study found that electronic decision support paired with the usual workflow could render the deprescribing process scalable and effective. These results suggest that medication reviews should incorporate deprescribing as part of usual care.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04762303.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Antidepressant Drugs: Overview
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Electroconvulsive Therapy