Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
An integrative approach to prioritize candidate causal genes for complex traits in cattle
Mohammad Ghoreishifar1,2, Iona M Macleod1,2, Amanda J Chamberlain1,2
1Agriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
None:
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with complex traits, predominantly in non-coding regions, posing challenges in pinpointing the causal variants and their target genes. Three types of evidence can help identify the gene through which QTL acts: (1) proximity to the most significant GWAS variant, (2) correlation of gene expression with the trait, and (3) the gene's physiological role in the trait. However, there is still uncertainty about the success of these methods in identifying the correct genes. Here, we test the ability of these methods in a comparatively simple series of traits associated with the concentration of polar lipids in milk. We conducted single-trait GWAS for ~14 million imputed variants and 56 individual milk polar lipid (PL) phenotypes in 336 cows. A multi-trait meta-analysis of GWAS identified 10,063 significant SNPs at FDR ≤ 10% (P ≤ 7.15E-5). Transcriptome data from blood (~12.5K genes, 143 cows) and mammary tissue (~12.2K genes, 169 cows) were analyzed using the genetic score omics regression (GSOR) method. This method links observed gene expression to genetically predicted phenotypes and was used to find associations between gene expression and 56 PL phenotypes. GSOR identified 2,186 genes in blood and 1,404 in mammary tissue associated with at least one PL phenotype (FDR ≤ 1%). We partitioned the genome into non-overlapping windows of 100 Kb to test for overlap between GSOR-identified genes and GWAS signals. We found a significant overlap between these two datasets, indicating that GSOR-significant genes were more likely to be located within 100 Kb windows that include GWAS signals than those that do not (P = 0.01; odds ratio = 1.47). These windows included 70 significant genes expressed in mammary tissue and 95 in blood. Compared to all expressed genes in each tissue, these genes were enriched for lipid metabolism gene ontology (GO). That is, seven of the 70 significant mammary transcriptome genes (P < 0.01; odds ratio = 3.98) and five of the 95 significant blood genes (P < 0.10; odds ratio = 2.24) were involved in lipid metabolism GO. The candidate causal genes include DGAT1, ACSM5, SERINC5, ABHD3, CYP2U1, PIGL, ARV1, SMPD5, and NPC2, with some overlap between the two tissues. The overlap between GWAS, GSOR, and GO analyses suggests that together, these methods are more likely to identify genes mediating QTL, though their power remains limited, as reflected by modest odds ratios. Larger sample sizes would enhance the power of these analyses, but issues like linkage disequilibrium would remain.
More Related Videos
08:27Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
09:35A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
Published on: August 16, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Incomplete Dominance
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Epistasis Analysis
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...