Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Extraction of Venom and Venom Gland Microdissections from Spiders for Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analyses
Published on: November 3, 2014
Venomic and F(ab')₂ antivenomic studies of Bothrops alternatus venom proteins
Luciano S Fusco1, Emidio Beraldo-Neto2, Juan J Calvete3
1Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Química Básica y Aplicada del Nordeste Argentino (IQUIBA-NEA), Corrientes, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (UNNE), Avenida Libertad 5470, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina.
In this study, using a proteomic approach, we performed the venomic characterization of B. alternatus venom proteins. The venom comprises toxins from eleven protein families and the main identified included PIII-SVMP (27.32%), PII-SVMP (12.33%), Disintegrin-SVMP (10.26%), SVSP (8.80%), PLA2 (6.85%), BBP/C-NP (4.85%), CRVP (4.87%), CTL (6.80%), LAAO (4.14%), SVGF (1.90%), VPA (1.64%), PDE (0.07%), and an unidentified percentage (11.64%). Antivenomic analysis showed that both F(ab')₂ antivenoms recognized all venom proteins but had low affinity for small peptides like BPP. The BIOL antivenom demonstrated a binding capacity of 56.92 mg/g F(ab')2, while the INPB antivenom showed a significantly higher binding capacity of 124.78 mg/g F(ab')2. These results align with in vivo studies, where the antivenom potency was 63.28 mg/g F(ab')2 and 129.38 mg/g F(ab')2 for BIOL and INPB, respectively. This study highlights the value of third-generation antivenomics in characterizing antivenoms used against B. alternatus envenomation and confirms the effectiveness of these two antivenoms in treating snakebites caused by B. alternatus. In conclusion, this study reports for the first time a comparative analysis of the venomics and antivenomics of two antivenoms used in Argentina for the treatment of B. alternatus snake bites, integrating both in vitro and in vivo approaches.
In this study, using a proteomic approach, we performed the venomic characterization of B. alternatus venom proteins. The venom comprises toxins from eleven protein families and the main identified included PIII-SVMP (27.32%), PII-SVMP (12.33%), Disintegrin-SVMP (10.26%), SVSP (8.80%), PLA2 (6.85%), BBP/C-NP (4.85%), CRVP (4.87%), CTL (6.80%), LAAO (4.14%), SVGF (1.90%), VPA (1.64%), PDE (0.07%), and an unidentified percentage (11.64%). Antivenomic analysis showed that both F(ab')₂ antivenoms recognized all venom proteins but had low affinity for small peptides like BPP. The BIOL antivenom demonstrated a binding capacity of 56.92 mg/g F(ab')2, while the INPB antivenom showed a significantly higher binding capacity of 124.78 mg/g F(ab')2. These results align with in vivo studies, where the antivenom potency was 63.28 mg/g F(ab')2 and 129.38 mg/g F(ab')2 for BIOL and INPB, respectively. This study highlights the value of third-generation antivenomics in characterizing antivenoms used against B. alternatus envenomation and confirms the effectiveness of these two antivenoms in treating snakebites caused by B. alternatus. In conclusion, this study reports for the first time a comparative analysis of the venomics and antivenomics of two antivenoms used in Argentina for the treatment of B. alternatus snake bites, integrating both in vitro and in vivo approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Properties of Amines
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Drug Toxicity: Overview
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Bacterial Toxins

