Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

The In ovo CAM-assay as a Xenograft Model for Sarcoma
Published on: July 17, 2013
First-Line Camizestrant for Emerging ESR1-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer
François-Clément Bidard1, Erica L Mayer2, Yeon Hee Park3
1Institut Curie, Paris and Saint-Cloud; INSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1428, Paris; Versailles-Saint-Quentin University, Paris-Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France.
Background:
Mutations in ESR1 are the most common mechanism of acquired resistance to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor for advanced breast cancer. Camizestrant, a next-generation selective estrogen-receptor (ER) degrader and complete ER antagonist, has shown antitumor activity in ER-positive advanced breast cancer.
Methods:
We tested patients with advanced breast cancer with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors for ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) once every 2 to 3 months. All the patients had received at least 6 months of first-line therapy with an aromatase inhibitor plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib). Patients who were found to have an ESR1 mutation and did not have radiologic progression were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to switch to camizestrant (75 mg once daily) with a continued CDK4/6 inhibitor plus placebo in place of an aromatase inhibitor or to continue to receive an aromatase inhibitor plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus placebo in place of camizestrant. The primary outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.
Results:
A total of 3256 patients were tested for an ESR1 mutation. The 315 eligible patients were assigned to switch to camizestrant (157 patients) or to continue to receive an aromatase inhibitor (158 patients). At an interim analysis at a median follow-up of 12.6 months, the median progression-free survival was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.7 to 18.2) in the camizestrant group and 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.2 to 9.5) in the aromatase-inhibitor group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.60; P<0.0001). The median time until a deterioration in the patient-reported global health status and quality of life occurred was 21.0 months with camizestrant and 6.4 months with an aromatase inhibitor (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.84). The frequency of discontinuation because of adverse events was 1.3% with camizestrant and 1.9% with an aromatase inhibitor.
Conclusions:
In patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation that emerged during treatment, those who were switched to camizestrant with continuation of a CDK4/6 inhibitor during first-line therapy had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who maintained the aromatase-inhibitor combination. (Funded by AstraZeneca; SERENA-6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04964934.).
Insights
Switching to camizestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations. This targeted therapy offers a better alternative to aromatase inhibitors for this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced breast cancer can develop acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, often due to ESR1 mutations.
- Camizestrant is a novel selective ER degrader and antagonist demonstrating antitumor activity in ER-positive advanced breast cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of switching to camizestrant compared to continuing an aromatase inhibitor in patients with advanced breast cancer and ESR1 mutations.
- To assess the impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and patient-reported outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with an AI plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor for at least 6 months were monitored for ESR1 mutations via ctDNA.
- Eligible patients with an ESR1 mutation and no radiologic progression were randomized 1:1 to either switch to camizestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor or continue with an AI plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
- The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.
Main Results:
- The camizestrant group (157 patients) achieved a median PFS of 16.0 months, compared to 9.2 months in the aromatase inhibitor group (158 patients) (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.44; P<0.0001).
- Median time to deterioration in global health status and quality of life was significantly longer with camizestrant (21.0 months) versus aromatase inhibitors (6.4 months) (HR, 0.54).
- Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low and similar between groups (1.3% for camizestrant vs. 1.9% for aromatase inhibitor).
Conclusions:
- Switching to camizestrant in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor offers a significant improvement in progression-free survival for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations.
- Camizestrant demonstrated a favorable safety profile and improved patient-reported quality of life compared to continuing aromatase inhibitor therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

