First-Line Camizestrant for Emerging ESR1-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer

François-Clément Bidard1, Erica L Mayer2, Yeon Hee Park3

  • 1Institut Curie, Paris and Saint-Cloud; INSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1428, Paris; Versailles-Saint-Quentin University, Paris-Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France.

Abstract

Insights

Switching to camizestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations. This targeted therapy offers a better alternative to aromatase inhibitors for this patient population.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Endocrinology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive advanced breast cancer can develop acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, often due to ESR1 mutations.
  • Camizestrant is a novel selective ER degrader and antagonist demonstrating antitumor activity in ER-positive advanced breast cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of switching to camizestrant compared to continuing an aromatase inhibitor in patients with advanced breast cancer and ESR1 mutations.
  • To assess the impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and patient-reported outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with an AI plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor for at least 6 months were monitored for ESR1 mutations via ctDNA.
  • Eligible patients with an ESR1 mutation and no radiologic progression were randomized 1:1 to either switch to camizestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor or continue with an AI plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
  • The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.

Main Results:

  • The camizestrant group (157 patients) achieved a median PFS of 16.0 months, compared to 9.2 months in the aromatase inhibitor group (158 patients) (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.44; P<0.0001).
  • Median time to deterioration in global health status and quality of life was significantly longer with camizestrant (21.0 months) versus aromatase inhibitors (6.4 months) (HR, 0.54).
  • Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low and similar between groups (1.3% for camizestrant vs. 1.9% for aromatase inhibitor).

Conclusions:

  • Switching to camizestrant in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor offers a significant improvement in progression-free survival for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations.
  • Camizestrant demonstrated a favorable safety profile and improved patient-reported quality of life compared to continuing aromatase inhibitor therapy.