Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Revisiting Randomized Controlled Trials: Reassessing Their Role as the Gold Standard for Evidence-Based Treatments
1Department of Psychology, Kent State University.
Abstract:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have traditionally been the gold standard for determining whether a treatment is empirically supported. Nevertheless, there has been an increase in criticism of RCTs for psychotherapeutic research due to their high rate of biases, lack of replicability, and discrepancies in real-world applications. The author discusses the weaknesses of RCTs and the need to refine how we view psychotherapeutic treatments as efficacious.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Regression Toward the Mean