Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Experimental Human Pneumococcal Carriage
Published on: February 15, 2013
Economic Evaluation of PHID-CV versus PCV10-SII Compared with no Vaccination in the Philippines
Nurilign Ahmed1, Ru Han2, Edwin Rodriguez3
1GSK, WN23, Avenue Fleming 20, 1300, Wavre, Belgium. nurilign.x.ahmed@gsk.com.
Insights
Both pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) are cost-effective compared to no vaccination. PHiD-CV offers more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) but at a higher cost than the new PCV10-SII.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Vaccinology
Background:
- Streptococcus pneumoniae causes invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), including pneumonia, meningitis, and bacteremia.
- The Philippines utilizes PCV13 and PHiD-CV in its national immunization program.
- A new 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10-SII) has received WHO prequalification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of two 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV10-SII and PHiD-CV) in the Philippines.
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of PCV10-SII and PHiD-CV against no vaccination.
- To evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness between PCV10-SII and PHiD-CV.
Main Methods:
- An adapted Markov model was used to evaluate health outcomes and costs in the Philippines.
- The model simulated outcomes like bacteremia, meningitis, pneumonia, acute otitis media (AOM), sequelae, and death over a 5-year horizon.
- Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs were calculated, with a 3.66% discount rate applied. PCV10-SII price was modeled at a 20% discount, with sensitivity analyses conducted for price reductions of 5-15%.
Main Results:
- Both PCV vaccination strategies dominated the 'no vaccination' strategy, offering greater health benefits at lower overall costs.
- PHiD-CV demonstrated a higher incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 54,553 Philippine pesos (PHPs) per QALY gained compared to PCV10-SII in the base case.
- PHiD-CV yielded more QALYs (ΔQALY: 2929) by preventing more cases of meningitis, bacteremia, and AOM, albeit at a higher direct cost due to vaccine price differences.
Conclusions:
- Both pneumococcal conjugate vaccine strategies are superior to no vaccination, providing enhanced health benefits at reduced total costs.
- While PHiD-CV resulted in more QALYs gained, it incurred higher direct costs compared to PCV10-SII.
- The cost-effectiveness findings are highly sensitive to the assumed price of PCV10-SII, with PHiD-CV becoming dominant if PCV10-SII price reduction is 5% or less.
Introduction:
Streptococcus pneumoniae can cause serious invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), such as pneumonia, meningitis and bactaeremia. Two pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines (PCV), the 13-valent PCV13 and 10-valent PHiD-CV, are included in the Philippines' National Formulary and implemented in the national immunisation programme. Recently, a new 10-valent PCV (PCV10-SII) has received World Health Organization prequalification status. The objective of this study was to assess cost-effectiveness of the two 10-valent PCVs versus no vaccination and the relative cost-effectiveness of the two vaccines.
Methods:
An existing Markov model was adapted to the Philippines context. Health outcomes, including bacteraemia, meningitis, pneumonia, acute otitis media (AOM), sequelae and death, were evaluated over a 5-year horizon without discounting. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs were calculated over a lifetime horizon, applying a discount rate of 3.66%. The price of PCV10-SII was assumed to be 20% below the PHiD-CV market price; this price reduction was varied between 5% and 15% in scenario analyses.
Results:
Both vaccination strategies dominated the 'no vaccination' strategy, producing more health benefits at lower total costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of PHiD-CV versus PCV10-SII was 54,553 Philippine pesos (PHPs) per QALY gained in the base case analysis. Vaccination with PHiD-CV was predicted to yield more QALYs compared with PCV10-SII (ΔQALY: 2929) since more cases of meningitis, bactaeremia and AOM were prevented but at higher direct costs due to the vaccine price difference. PHiD-CV would be the dominant option if the price reduction for PCV10-SII was at most 5%.
Conclusions:
Both vaccination strategies are superior to no vaccination, producing more health benefits at lower costs. QALYs gained are higher with PHiD-CV but at higher direct costs. Results are most sensitive to assumptions about PCV10-SII vaccine price.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

