Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Principles and Practice in Pediatric Vascular Trauma: Part 1: Scope of Problem, Team Structure, Multidisciplinary
Matthew T Harting1, Natalie A Drucker2, Mary T Austin3
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Red Duke Trauma Institute at Memorial Hermann - Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Insights
Penetrating injuries are a leading cause of death in US children. Optimizing pediatric vascular trauma response teams is crucial for managing these critical injuries and improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Trauma Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Penetrating injuries are the leading cause of death for US children and adolescents (ages 1-19) as of 2020.
- Vascular injuries from trauma significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients.
- Prompt management of vascular trauma is essential to prevent life-threatening hemorrhage and limb ischemia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the scope of traumatic vascular injuries in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate current evidence, outcomes, and challenges in pediatric vascular trauma care.
- To propose optimized pediatric vascular trauma response solutions and team structures.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of traumatic vascular injuries in pediatric populations.
- Analysis of current evidence regarding outcomes and management strategies.
- Discussion of different vascular response team structures and their efficacy.
Main Results:
- Increasing frequency of pediatric vascular injuries requiring surgical intervention.
- Variability in the structure and effectiveness of vascular response teams in children's hospitals.
- Need for specialized expertise and integrated teams for optimal hemorrhage control and revascularization.
Conclusions:
- An integrated, multidisciplinary approach is superior to ad hoc methods for pediatric vascular trauma.
- Standardized outcome targets and improved team structures are necessary for pediatric vascular trauma response.
- Further research is needed to optimize care delivery and improve survival rates for pediatric vascular injuries.
Abstract:
As of 2020, penetrating injuries became the leading cause of death among children and adolescents ages 1-19 in the United States. For the patients who initially survive and receive advanced medical care, vascular injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and additionally trigger notable trauma team angst. Moreover, penetrating injuries can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage and/or limb-threatening ischemia if not addressed promptly. Vascular injury management demands timely and unique expertise, particularly for pediatric patients. As the frequency of vascular injuries requiring operative management increases, it becomes clear that an ad hoc approach is not ideal. An integrated team would provide the best approach for rapid hemorrhage control and revascularization, but the structure of vascular response teams at children's hospitals is highly variable. In part 1 of this review, we will evaluate the scope and extent of the epidemic of traumatic vascular injuries in pediatric patients, review current evidence and outcomes, discuss various challenges and advantages of different team structures, and outline potential outcome targets and pediatric vascular trauma response solutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: n/a.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

