Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detection and identification: how are they related?

J P Thomas

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science
    |September 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Detection and identification rely on similar sensory data but differ in decision-making. This study found no distinct sensory limits for either task, with accuracy correlating closely with stimulus strength.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Magnetic Monopole Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.36  TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC.

    Physical review letters·2025

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive psychology
    • Sensory processing
    • Perception

    Background:

    • Distinguishing between sensory detection and identification is crucial for understanding perception.
    • Previous research suggests shared sensory mechanisms but differing cognitive processes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the relationship between sensory detection and identification.
    • To determine if distinct sensory processing mechanisms underlie detection and identification tasks.
    • To quantify the independence of stimulus processing in identification.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of detection and identification tasks using identical sensory information.
    • Examination of accuracy variations based on stimulus strength.
    • Quantitative modeling of the relationship between detection and identification performance.

    Main Results:

    • No evidence of different sensory cutoffs for detection versus identification.
    • Accuracies for both tasks showed a similar dependency on stimulus strength.
    • Identification accuracy was linked to the degree of independent stimulus processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Detection and identification share fundamental sensory processing.
    • Decision-making processes differentiate these two perceptual tasks.
    • The relationship between detection and identification can reveal the extent of independent processing.

    Related Experiment Videos