Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Single-centre, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled phase-3 non-inferiority study to investigate the safety
Hendrik T Tevaearai Stahel1, Gabriel Weiss2,3, Peter Landowski2,3
1Cardiovascular Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Objectives:
Effective and reliable cardioplegic cardiac arrest is crucial for maximizing myocardial protection and preserving postoperative contractile function. Aim of this study was to demonstrate, in line with an ongoing European registration procedure, the efficacy and safety of the new Cardioplexol™ solution.
Methods:
Single-centre, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled phase-3 non-inferiority trial comparing Cardioplexol™ and Buckberg solutions during cardiac surgery. Patients planed for elective CABG, valve surgery and/or aortic root surgery, were considered eligible after meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Peak troponin-T (TnT) during the first 24 h post-reperfusion was defined as primary endpoint. Intraoperative and ICU-related secondary endpoints were also evaluated, as were safety endpoints.
Results:
Out of 248 operated patients, 226 (100 Cardioplexol™, 126 Buckberg) were considered for per-protocol analysis. Peak-TnT was similar in both groups (0.77 vs. 0.78 ng/ml) and non-inferiority of Cardioplexol™ was confirmed. Delay before complete cardiac arrest (11 vs. 71 s, p < 0.001) and cross-clamp time (51.2 vs. 60.7 min, p < 0.001) were shorter after Cardioplexol™. The defibrillation rate was also significantly reduced (10% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, cumulative dose of catecholamines within 24 h postreperfusion (6,202 vs. 7,170 µg/kg, p = 0.07), and ICU stay (38.1 vs. 44.0 h, p = 0.110) also appeared reduced after Cardioplexol™. Mortality was lower after Cardioplexol™ (1 pt. vs. 5 pts.). Safety parameters were comparable in both groups.
Conclusion:
Efficacy and safety of Cardioplexol™ were demonstrated.
Clinical Trial Registration:
https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2011-004198-10/results, Eudra CT-No: 2011-004198-10.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
08:21Functional Assessment of the Donor Heart During Ex Situ Perfusion: Insights from Pressure-Volume Loops and Surface Echocardiography
Published on: October 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care