Routine Imaging After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Nationwide Utilization and Survival Analysis
- Iris W J M van Goor 1,2, Paul C M Andel 1, Simone Augustinus 3,4, Vincent P Groot 1, Gaja Thurairajah 3,4, Marc G Besselink 3,4, Bert A Bonsing 5, Koop Bosscha 6, Olivier R Busch 3,4, Geert A Cirkel 7, Ronald M van Dam 8, Sebastiaan Festen 9, Bas Groot Koerkamp 10, Erwin van der Harst 11, Ignace H J T de Hingh 12, Martijn P W Intven 2, Geert Kazemier 4,13, Mike S L Liem 14, Gert Meijer 2, Vincent E de Meijer 15, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs 16, Daphne Roos 17, Jennifer M J Schreinemakers 18, Martijn W J Stommel 19, Fennie Wit 20, Robert C Verdonk 21, Hjalmar C van Santvoort 1, Lois A Daamen 1,22, I Quintus Molenaar 1,
- Iris W J M van Goor 1,2, Paul C M Andel 1, Simone Augustinus 3,4
- 1Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- 3Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- 4Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- 5Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- 6Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands.
- 7Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- 8Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
- 9Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- 10Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- 11Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- 12Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
- 13Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- 14Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
- 15Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
- 16Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
- 17Department of Surgery, Renier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands.
- 18Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
- 19Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
- 20Department of Surgery, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, the Netherlands.
- 21Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- 22Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- 0Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Routine imaging after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection improves survival by detecting asymptomatic recurrence and enabling timely treatment. This supports its inclusion in clinical guidelines for better patient outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background
- Limited evidence exists on the benefits of routine imaging post-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection for detecting recurrence.
- Increased availability of effective PDAC recurrence treatments may drive routine imaging use.
Purpose Of The Study
- To assess the utilization of routine imaging after PDAC resection.
- To evaluate the impact of routine imaging on survival outcomes in PDAC patients.
Main Methods
- Nationwide observational cohort study of PDAC resection patients in the Netherlands (2014-2019).
- Stratification based on surveillance strategy (routine imaging vs. symptomatic surveillance).
- Analysis of overall survival (OS), asymptomatic recurrence, and recurrence treatment using Kaplan-Meier, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazard models.
Main Results
- 1311 patients included; 11% received routine imaging.
- Routine imaging group had significantly longer median OS (43 months) vs. symptomatic surveillance (22 months).
- Routine imaging was associated with higher rates of asymptomatic recurrence, recurrence treatment, and improved OS.
Conclusions
- Routine imaging after PDAC resection is independently linked to detecting asymptomatic recurrence and improved survival.
- Findings support the integration of routine imaging into clinical guidelines for post-PDAC resection care.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

