Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Developing an evaluation tool for the impact of consumer partnerships in healthcare governance: a coproduced mixed
Rae Parker1, Jodie Nixon2,3, Faiza El-Higzi4
1Clinical Governance, Risk and Legal, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Eight Mile Plains, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Rae.parker@health.qld.gov.au.
Background:
Consumer partnerships are a recent innovation in healthcare governance to diversify decision-making perspectives. These partnerships bring complexity necessitating comprehensive evaluation. This study proposes that evaluation tools should include the impact of healthcare governance partnerships. This study aimed to coproduce an impact evaluation tool for healthcare governance committee partnerships.
Methods:
This study used a coproduced mixed methods cross-sectional design conducted in two phases. The first study phase included an online focus group and online survey to identify stakeholder expectations and needs for an impact evaluation design. The second study phase used an adapted Jandhyala Method to determine participant awareness of governance committee partnership impacts and consensus agreement to establish an impact evaluation survey. The development of governance committee partnership impact items was guided by a capability development framework for successful staff and consumer partnerships for quality improvement and the Engage with Impact Toolkit.
Results:
In phase one, staff (n=4) and consumer partners (n=3) provided recommendations to improve the development and acceptance of a governance committee partnership impact evaluation. Phase two was completed by 34 participants (>90% completion). An initial online survey generated 338 statements detailing broad governance committee partnership impacts. No statistically significant difference in the count of impacts by Engage with Impact Toolkit domains was found between staff and consumer partners. A second online survey resulted in a consensus ranking of 24 impact statements for inclusion. The highest consensus impact domains are knowledge, confidence and trust, equity and inclusivity and patient outcomes and experience.
Conclusion:
This study pragmatically used the insights of expert staff and consumer partners to develop a prioritised list of survey items to evaluate the impact of healthcare governance committee partnering effectiveness. The resulting healthcare governance committee partnership impact evaluation item list has the potential to be used in other healthcare organisations.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Patient-centered Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
