Adapting, Sustaining and Scaling Violence against Women and Children Prevention Interventions in Low- and
Kathryn L Falb1, Alexandra Blackwell1, Manya Balanchander1
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Abstract:
The field of violence against women and children (VAW/C) prevention has made significant progress in identifying effective strategies to prevent violence. However, there are still gaps in understanding how to sustain and scale evidence-based interventions across diverse settings. At the same time, implementation science offers approaches that could help achieve greater scale, sustainability, and equity. Despite its potential, implementation science approaches have not been fully applied to VAW/C research. To address this gap, a scoping review was conducted to identify the frameworks employed, understand the most frequently studied implementation domains, examine any specific challenges captured within the applied implementation science frameworks related to delivering survivor-centered violence prevention programming, and illuminate the role of practice-based knowledge within implementation science efforts for violence prevention programming. The review, conducted between 2023 and 2024, identified 40 VAW/C evaluation studies that included implementation or process evaluation components, with most studies published after 2020. Commonly used implementation science frameworks included the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) model, and the Medical Research Council (MRC) frameworks. Key implementation domains studied were fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility. However, scale and sustainability-critical priorities for practitioners, policymakers, and donors-were only minimally addressed in the literature. In addition, there was limited focus on implementing survivor-centered practices and incorporating practice-based knowledge. The findings highlight the need for long-term collaborations between researchers and practitioners that explicitly integrate implementation science. Such partnerships could help adapt, scale, and sustain evidence-based VAW/C prevention programs more effectively while ensuring they remain survivor-centered.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
05:35Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
